We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More
| 76637 | 34359041 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) posts if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden posts if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 45 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
44. 100! - October 11, '19 at 08:58 am, 10 users, 23 days 20 hours 57 minutes.
sciller45 (3)[11], charlesjoseph [2], disastermaster30, Bears Bears Bears, robsob20061017, Yellowcat [8], Hunter902 [2], armorplayergc [22], bensonbeagle, meaosome
45. 100! - May 09, '20 at 00:03 am, 13 users, 50 days 6 hours 5 minutes.
disastermaster30 (1)[2], RebelGamer_98, Bears_Bears_Bears [2], red303 [9], Yellowcat (1)[9], armorplayergc [23], ismael6, sciller45 (3)[12], Hunter902 [3], akshobhya [10], GhostOfMatrix [2], lozerfac3, SpiritTaker
20. @KatPryde I understand that you bought Chasing Shadows? I've mixed things up - 1337 waves are in GC Labyrinth in endurance mode, maybe with some setup. I saw that only on @armorplayergc screenshot, like a year ago. Anyway, in CC there's also endurance (infinite?) and that begs for some crazily hard achievements. I'd check everything if I were on PC.
21. GemCraft Labyrinth's Endurance has 1337 waves, and 169 fields in total, but I've only won like 20 Endurances on it, they aren't really that hard once you reach a high level, even with the highest difficulty settings
GemCraft Chasing Shadows has 999 waves on Endurance mode, but compared to the previous game, these Endurances are HARD, I have 122 hours on it on Steam, and I went above level 5000 or 6000, yet I only managed to win 1 Endurance, on the easiest field, and in the lowest difficulty possible (Looming)
But I mean, it's a really nice game, the only problem is that it gets very laggy if you make a very serious Endurance run...
Hopefully though, the next GemCraft won't have this issue, I've read that they're making it less laggy
I'm also anxious for Epic Battle Fantasy V, and Kingdom Rush: Origins for Steam...
23. In Swords and Souls who has the highest strength training record? Mine is 3182
24. Not sure about what others think, but I found Swords and Souls too grindy to be enjoyable. Or maybe I just suck. Probably the latter.
Oof. 169 field with 1337 waves. Did that maths and that's ≈ 226.000 waves.
Are levels in Gemcraft like in Cursed Treasure 2/Kingdom Rush? Or are they shorter and easier levels?
26. well, if you mean the levels including Endurance, especially in GemCraft Chasing Shadows, GemCraft is harder
but if you meant only the normal levels, I think GemCraft is easier because you can always level up, get lots of skill points and become powerful, while your maximum power in Cursed Treasure is kinda limited once you've maxed all the skills
27. 3182 in strength training - oh Gosh! 0_0 I barely did the requirement for that quest. I think that was 300 and I made 8 more. And I can kinda cover my low skillz with lagz I had in that game (that species with image slideshow and variables working like a gold).
Swords and Souls is kinda grindy, but still it's much less repetitive than TDs in general. But so are most action RPGs. I don't mind repetitive games - after you get grip on them, they leave lots of brain unused, perfect for things like audiobooks. The difficulty in Cursed Treasure 2 and GM Labyringth was very similar in my case. They have many differences in gameplay, though. I became better at GM quicker.
29. Like I didn't enjoy Chasing Shadows. Yesterday I found this creepy short film Makes me wanna concoct some sick creepypasta.
30. And like I didn't play it. Luckily, I am free tomorrow and Monday is a holiday, so I think I'll play through Gemcraft. After a few years of delaying it, I'll at least pass the first one.
@PLGuy that is seriously sick. Best part is [Watch it first if you didn't already. It's only 5 minutes long] when he started eating the other boy's blended up remains. "Yeah, a giant almost blended me up and ate me while he was watching TV and I'm not sure he's dead. Well... I'm not going to let that other boy rot. Starving children in Africa and all that. Yum!".
I'm surprised that Hansel and Gretel isn't so much different from the original. Most fairy tales are IIRC mellower versions of the original, while H&G remained mostly the same.
32. Hehehe xD I didn't warn about anything so you guys could be as surprised as me with that animation. I think it's brilliant. Only some pieces from Crypt TV are comparible from the horror shorts I've watched so far. Now it's kinda hard to decide which should be played first in GM series, the first part or Chapter 0.
1. Btw, I did the checking of the count and all that. Sorry for the delay. I'd be happy if posts like #74 would remain a rarity, but other than that it was fine.
3. Did we reset because b2b? and also did anyone get 100% on Rogue Soul 2 (This means getting all the distance trophies too).
1. I think I'll start with whichever is shorter. It can wait, though, gotta wait for my internet to return. Writing through mobile data.
@Raiiker Probably. Wouldn't know why anyone would be willing to, though.
Also, DON'T count with the mods. Next thing you know, you score an own goal. Well, if you could...
3. It would be really funny if "that" actually happens. I'm thinking of giving them mods a chance to win, since they don't really count to 100 as we always ruined their count by just hopping in, plus they have to moderate the forum + game for any wrongdoings.
4. The Untold rulebook of the count, page 21 verses 8-10 say: *ahem*
Thou shalt not feel bad for those whose names shalt not be spoken, for they are the meany baddies of this game. Thus, thou shalt not feel bad for them.
Also, those whose names shalt not be spoken hath a handicap that shalt allow them victory roughly every 10 victories.
You must be logged in to post a reply!
We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More