Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

Tobacco Ban Passed

Posted May 4, '14 at 8:26pm

Fiends

Fiends

114 posts

A tobacco ban in Tasmania (Australia) has passed a little while ago and now there's a potential look in for a similar ban across all of Australia.(http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/world-affairs/2012/08/tobacco-ban-people-born-after-year-2000-passes-tasmanian-upper-house)

The ban still allows people to smoke but anyone born after January 1, 2000 will never be allowed to buy tobacco products over the counter, regardless of how old they are. Meaning even after they turn 18, 30, 50, etc, they will still be denied the purchase from anywhere that sells tobacco due to their date of birth.

I guess it's a smart move as it doesn't piss off the smokers of this generation, and the oldest person currently affected by this new rule would be 14, and I can assume most parents (even if they themselves smoke a lot) wouldn't want their kids to take up the habit. I understand that kids these days will still smoke if they want to as they're likely to have friends born before 2000 to buy it for them, but it means that in the years coming the youngest age eligible to buy cigarettes will go up and up, until the point nobody can buy them at all.

It has been rumoured that a similar approach will be taken across other countries in an attempt to ban tobacco in the future.

Thoughts? Any angry smokers out there? Any smokers out there that approve of the decision?

 

Posted May 4, '14 at 9:07pm

Kasic

Kasic

5,750 posts

I honestly wouldn't care if people decided to smoke if they could be responsible about it and not hurt others. But they can't. Cigarette butts are the #1 most littered item in the world. Those littered cigarette butts do not decompose and kill wildlife/children along with leaking hazardous chemicals and poisoning the environment. Second hand smoke is damaging to health, can lead to asthma in kids, damages the value of houses, and smells like crap. At this point it isn't just one person's habit.

 

Posted May 5, '14 at 3:37am

HahiHa

HahiHa

5,440 posts

Knight

Would it still be allowed to grow your own tobacco and smoke a lil' pipe at home from time to time?

 

Posted May 5, '14 at 4:43am

mbbs112

mbbs112

196 posts

That's a great thing to do Australia since Smoking is really bad and this Generation is already bad and now it will probably be less* bad.

 

Posted May 5, '14 at 8:34am

MattEmAngel

MattEmAngel

7,210 posts

I think it's a good idea. It will likely lead to a rough patch for the police and for people who still want to smoke. Remember the ban on alcohol in America? People started making their own (moonshine) and spreading it illegally. Granted, it's probably more difficult to make your own cigarettes, but I suspect they will have to deal with people trying to smuggle them or stash them.

The pros outweigh the cons, though, as cigarettes do absolutely nothing good for the body besides satisfy the craving for them you get when you're addicted. I know a man who is now 87 years old. He stopped smoking over 40 years ago and compensates by working hard and eating well to stay healthy and strong. Six months ago it caught up with him. He becomes short of breath after any activity and has almost died in his sleep a few times due to asphyxiation. Anything to legally get people to stop using tobacco is approved by me.

Second hand smoke is damaging to health, can lead to asthma in kids, damages the value of houses, and smells like crap.


I worked construction one summer with a boss who smokes a "cigarillo" for breakfast every day at 8 AM. Riding in his truck was unbearable. I still have trouble believing that something that smells so bad can become so addictive.
 

Posted May 5, '14 at 8:41am

nichodemus

nichodemus

13,473 posts

Knight

That's smart, as OP mentioned, it wouldn't affect those who already smoke, and will rant against the law. It's brilliant planning for the future, and I hope that it'll work out eventually. Glad to see it might be considered by my country.

 

Posted May 5, '14 at 9:01am

09philj

09philj

2,146 posts

I don't see a full ban coming to the UK in the near future. The sale of tobacco brings in too much tax to be forbidden outright.

 

Posted May 5, '14 at 9:09am

Kennethhartanto

Kennethhartanto

248 posts

They are going to need one hell of a foolproof way to manage this ban successfully. Banning something without the enforcement would let the black market and self producers have the ability to bypass the law and make much money, which is like forbidden narcotics trade.

I still have trouble believing that something that smells so bad can become so addictive.


Believe me, it is very addicting. Smoking once has a negligible effect on your nerve system ( in a way that it does not cause addiction). once you smoke twice however, you will be caught in a spiral of using more and more of the substance. failing to commit yourself to smoking after passing the second time, would cause anxiety, a loss of concentration, and cause you to be moody, an effect i saw at my father who is a heavy smoker. It is very addicting, so much that i fail to understand the logic as to why should we not classify cigarettes as narcotics
 

Posted May 7, '14 at 4:55pm

MRWalker82

MRWalker82

4,200 posts

Moderator

I think its a brilliant idea. I wish something like this had been in place when I was younger so I would have likely not started smoking. I have had many addictions in my life and smoking has been the hardest to deal with. It is expensive, its horrible for my health, and despite numerous efforts and approaches to quitting, I still can't walk away from cigarettes.

 

Posted May 8, '14 at 9:31am

nichodemus

nichodemus

13,473 posts

Knight

@Ken

Not really. You don't become addicted from the first puff or stick. You'd need to really take quite a few sticks at the beginning, or coax yourself into continuing the habit at the beginning. Then it kicks in.

 
Reply to Tobacco Ban Passed

You must be logged in to post a reply!