Welcome to the Experimental Forum Game. We are currently in the third stage of experiments. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here*, but please keep the following in mind:
1. This is one of the stupidest forum games you will play.
2. Forum rules still apply here.
3. [REDACTED]
4. Do not lose too many points or [REDACTED].
_____
Footnote:
*The Gantic is a liar. That is fact.
()_() Gantic has taken over this thread.
(-ò_ó) Long live the Rabbit King!
o(")_(") Great is the White One!
So, describing a bad point without executing it gains -000, and vice versa.
That makes sense.
New guess of the point system (aka the 1st [REDACTED]):
+ points for a good point - points for a bad point Each point is worth 0, 50, or 100 points depending on execution. Some posts have multiple points. In that case, the point values are summed for the post's point value.
The more accurate a correct post is the more points you get.
Given that I gained 150 points for my post and you gained 100 for that, we seem to be getting closer to a correct point system. Since Gantic has yet to edit the OP, there's still at least one flaw in my guess. Perhaps the flaw is that each post counts as a single point, and a +/- means the post contains both good and bad points, which offset for a 0 point post.
This is a test of cooperativeness, logic and deduction.
