ForumsWEPRAnother new planet?

26 4421
Pegasus
offline
Pegasus
106 posts
Nomad

June 26 - European astronomers have found a trio of "super-Earths" circling a star 42 light years away. This is the first time three planets close to Earth's size have been found orbiting a single star, although they appear to be too hot to support life.

Using a relatively new tool, the HARPS (High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher) instrument at the European Southern Observatory in La Silla, Chile, the Swiss-French team examined over 100 stars previously thought to lack orbiting planets and found that around 30 percent had super-Earths. Past experiments had shown that only about 7 percent of stars had planets circling them. This new discovery strengthens the idea that planets are a common feature of star systems, raising the chances that scientists will one day find a truly Earth-like world.

The National Academies have done several reports that examine current and planned scientific efforts to explore the possibility of life elsewhere in the universe. One such report, Life in the Universe: An Assessment of U.S. and International Programs in Astrobiology, assesses NASA's astrobiology program and makes recommendations to improve it.

Another report, The Astrophysical Context of Life, continues the assessment and examines how to better integrate various scientific research disciplines in order to focus NASA's astrobiology program. Also, The Limits of Organic Life of Planetary Systems considers the possibility of alternative or nonstandard chemistries for the existence of life in our solar system and beyond, and offers a guide to agencies and organizations that decide to fund such research.

Life in the Universe: An Assessment of U.S. and International Programs in Astrobiology
The Astrophysical Context of Life
The Limits of Organic Life of Planetary Systems
Other Resources
Geneva Extrasolar Planet Search Programmes

  • 26 Replies
DivineDarkness
offline
DivineDarkness
1,226 posts
Nomad

Lol, so he thinks blooday! UK people are better than everybody else because, thats where all the action happens/

Estel
offline
Estel
1,971 posts
Peasant

That still makes no sense. What is the point of discovering anything? To figure things out! Discovering all sorts of astronomical bodies and systems helps us learn about our Universe that we live in. We can't get to black holes, but it is almost neccessary for us to know about them because of what they could possibly do.

MsterXantos
offline
MsterXantos
438 posts
Nomad

yeah but who cares if we can't get there no point in discoverign ti if we can't get there

jeffwak906
offline
jeffwak906
237 posts
Shepherd

Well, there are probably 100's of these in our galaxy, but we don't have to find them all... ;-)

shermzx
offline
shermzx
564 posts
Nomad

i see no purpose in having another planet,seriously.

sometimes i wonder what NASA do...

going to mars sounds fun.but other than that,space is a boring thing to me

XXpinkyXX
offline
XXpinkyXX
103 posts
Nomad

you guys are big on science i guess but i dont think we would be able to reach that planet 42 light years away

Estel
offline
Estel
1,971 posts
Peasant

You guys obviously don't really understand what a planet is. It's not like we can choose to call something a planet or not. If everyone in the whole world was to say that Mars is NOT a planet, Mars would still be considered a planet because it revolves around the sun, isn't a satelite, etc.

@shermzx, we don't "have another planet." A planet is considered not if WE want it to be one, but the celestial body's characteristics.

shermzx
offline
shermzx
564 posts
Nomad

A light year is 5,865,696,000,000 miles (9,460,800,000,000 kilometers). That's a long way!

42 light years...go do ur own calculation.

sushihair
offline
sushihair
152 posts
Nomad

I agree with Estel.Every thing is a planet.You cant agree,disagree,or classify it,its just the way it is.

Estel
offline
Estel
1,971 posts
Peasant

With the technology we have now, we won't be able to reach anything that far, but recent technology does provide very good telescopes. Actually being on a celestial body is a whole different dimension than observing it. We can send satelites, or probes to bodies that far out. Humans don't have to go there in the flesh.....

Estel
offline
Estel
1,971 posts
Peasant

@sushihair, not everyhting is a planet, but you can't disagree on a celestial body being a planet if it agrees with the criteria.

Showing 16-26 of 26