ForumsPopular Media[necro] Harry Potter and Eragon

18 5664
CrimsonGears
offline
CrimsonGears
3 posts
Nomad

Why do producers waste their life on these crappy movies, reading the books gives you a beeter understanding..

  • 18 Replies
DarkSwitch
offline
DarkSwitch
4 posts
Nomad

I agree but movies sometimes put things in perspetcive.

bates
offline
bates
98 posts
Nomad

i agree, books have much more detail in them. The producers make the movies for the money.

Kurgle
offline
Kurgle
163 posts
Nomad

The Harry Potter movies were actually enjoyable while Eragon on the other hand was a terrible movie. They ruined it.

jwalshjr
offline
jwalshjr
536 posts
Peasant

ya they did ruin eragon, they took away so much of the realy stuff and added stuff that hadn't happened, i do enjoy the harry potter movies though, but i agree i've read most of the books (except a couple harry potters) and they are better

JMV
offline
JMV
63 posts
Nomad

Honestly, I don't like Harry Potter. I just don't. On the other hand, I love the Eritage Trilogy. But, when I look at the movies, it's the other way around (kinda). I sort of enjoy the HP movies, but Eragon was just horrible, definitely one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

delossantosj
offline
delossantosj
6,672 posts
Nomad

ya the herry potter movies only cut out the minor stuff but they atleat stik to the story in there movies.

eragon didnt even do that!

kareybh
offline
kareybh
158 posts
Nomad

yeah, eragon totally ruined the story with that horrible movie

KHROME
offline
KHROME
618 posts
Nomad

I hate them both. But I would have to say Eragon is better.

Thoth
offline
Thoth
44 posts
Nomad

While I see that most of you hate Harry Potter, you guys should know that as far as movies off books go, Harry Potter was one of the best. Most of the time movies will cut out major parts and try to include as much action as possible. While Harry Potter had a lot of action, almost all the important bits were included.

Eragon, on the other hand, was downright horrible *shudders*. The story was completely changed, ruining the setup for Eldest. Not to mention the fact that Arya didn't even have pointed ears. Probably the worst movie I have ever seen.

Anyways, while we are talking about movies off books I would like to say something to all Terry Pratchett fans. A movie of the Hogfather was made, it's three hours long, and it keeps almost everything the same as the book. (A bit of old news, but still usefull)

Also, could people please state why they think the movie was good or bad? Otherwise this topic will pretty much be a spam topic.

stwilly
offline
stwilly
219 posts
Peasant

Well the producers of Eragon pretty much ruined it for themselves. They killed off a lot of characters that are big roles in the second book so if they make a second movie its going to have nothing at all to do with the book

madgamer131
offline
madgamer131
671 posts
Nomad

really. i absolutely love the eraagon books, and was ecstatic when i first heard a movie was coming out. however, once i saw a trailer for the fisrt time, i was so disappointed i never even went to see it. btw, the third book comes out this september! i think

ialwayswin
offline
ialwayswin
777 posts
Jester

well honestly for both the book is better than the movie

Craze77
offline
Craze77
813 posts
Peasant

I agree. The books are always 20 times better. They always have more details, which make them better.

cargirl
offline
cargirl
9 posts
Nomad

i like the harrypotter books and the movie and ive only seen the movie for earogon!

cargirl
offline
cargirl
9 posts
Nomad

*eragon!*

Showing 1-15 of 18