I Dont think this topic is morally right. What do most people base thier scoring on? Rank? Posts? or is it a popularity contest. I Tink that from now on the person evaluating the person should get to know the person they are evaluating. Noob Rights people. You are making them feel bad.
its the fame of the user. lets face it youre not vvery famous but you dont have many p[osts or a rank
so its kind of a mix of all of them
so for my standerds which i have previously stated, are how often i see you, and what youre post count and rank are in comparison to mine. if you have a higher post count then me an automatic 6. if you have a higher rank but lower post couint, a 4. then you get whatever added on for however i think you are famous and however much ive seen you.
so for my ranking for sloth, he has a lower rank and post but i have seen him around latley which means he is posting, kight on the other hand dominates me in post and is in general mroe famous then most people
You aren't too well known so a fare score isn't possible. 4/10 anyways.
I Dont think this topic is morally right. What do most people base thier scoring on? Rank? Posts? or is it a popularity contest. I Tink that from now on the person evaluating the person should get to know the person they are evaluating. Noob Rights people. You are making them feel bad.
This is a game, and people rate according to what they think is proper. However it is usually a mix of post count, rank, reputation, status and activity.
I Dont think this topic is morally right. What do most people base thier scoring on? Rank? Posts? or is it a popularity contest. I Tink that from now on the person evaluating the person should get to know the person they are evaluating. Noob Rights people. You are making them feel bad.
It's fame. If you don't know them, they can't really be famous.
