Forums → Art, Music, and Writing → Periodic Poetry Contest - Theme: Touch of Truth (Page 390, due Jan. 28)
3868 | 3758604 |
- 3,868 Replies
3868 | 3758604 |
First, I will post the overall rules, and then I will post the specifics about this week.
Original rules, as stated by Ubertuna:
It must fit the week's theme.
It must be submitted by the deadline.
It cannot have inappropriate language in it.
It cannot be stolen (if you plagiarize, we will find you).
You cannot plagerize yourself. The definition of plagerism is to steal SOMEONE ELSE'S ideas.
So we could use old poems or parts of old poems that we made and submit them for the contest just as long as we made them? That kind of contradicts the rule on page 1: "The poem must be created for this contest"
Well the poem itself was created for this contest, a few of the lines were not, and I don't think it was intentional.
I see that the deadline was on September 17, right? As I understand it, judging usually occurs 2 days after the deadline, give or take. Since there has been no sign of Parsat yet, I would be happy to judge the contest for you if there has been no judging by tomorrow. That is, of course, if that's okay with everybody? It's fine if you don't want me to judge. I've never participated before, so that would make sense.
I see that the deadline was on September 17, right?
As I understand it, judging usually occurs 2 days after the deadline, give or take.
Since there has been no sign of Parsat yet, I would be happy to judge the contest for you if there has been no judging by tomorrow
I've never participated before
Well, I've semi returned, and if it's all right with the contestants if Parsat doesn't show up in the next little while I'm sure I can find time to cobble something together. Believe it or not despite being in university I find I have a bit more time on my hands.
Hey guys, I will volunteer to judge this round as the winner of last weeks. If you all are ok with it, then submit possible topics on my chat so that I could present one.
That is, if you are all okay with it...
If Parsat hasn't judged by 11:59pm AG time Tuesday (10 days after the extended contest deadline ended), then someone else should judge. That rule's not official or anything, but (to me at least) allowing someone 10 days for judging seems like a reasonable amount of time.
For the submission of peices. For judging, the time frame is indefinite. Its taken to the extreme of several weeks when Strop was doing it (true story bro).
You must have understood wrong.
I'd rather they take awhile and make it a good one, then do it 15 minutes after the round closes.
Sorry if I sound harsh, but this is one of my pet peeves. Ironic then, that I'm suppossed to judge the Haiku contest. :/
Wolf! You're back!
Honestly, I'd prefer it if someone who's been here for a while judges. Like Wolf.
Let's all wait until Parsat makes a post, yes?
Unless he decides to abdicate his position, we have no right to simply nominate another judge. The max was a few weeks? It has been one week so far, patience is a virtue.
Unless he decides to abdicate his position, we have no right to simply nominate another judge.
Let's all wait until Parsat makes a post, yes?
I second this motion.
We are now in line for a speaker in negation of this bill.
Thread is locked!