ForumsGamesXBOX 360 VS. Playstation 3

46 6541
wiggles33
offline
wiggles33
15 posts
Nomad

which one do you prefer?

  • 46 Replies
nonconformist
offline
nonconformist
1,101 posts
Nomad

um ya this rlly should be shut down but who cares.... PS3 RULES... WII DROOLS.... xbox is the middleman

Reeper696
offline
Reeper696
26 posts
Nomad

ps3

masta_cheef
offline
masta_cheef
668 posts
Nomad

ps3 is way better because you can acess internet,you can play online game,and you have a way better varitey of games such as assassins creed,hevenly sword and a new game that is coming out too human.i should now all this because i have both a xbox360 and a ps3

Well if you have both then you would know the Xbox has Online capabilities as well. Sure the 360 might not have heavenly sword. But It has Assassin's Creed and Too Human as well. PLUS The Xbox version of Team Fortress 2 is getting the weapons packs while you don't get squat. So 360 FTW!!!!!!!!1111one122two!!1
espadaxin2
offline
espadaxin2
484 posts
Blacksmith

ps3

Zombielord
offline
Zombielord
34 posts
Nomad

XBOX 360
And for the record the game library blows away the ps3
And haha Final Fantasy is now for XBOX360

Coolrunner30
offline
Coolrunner30
290 posts
Peasant

ps3 is much better but is more expensive

firetail_madness
offline
firetail_madness
20,540 posts
Blacksmith

I'm going to say the 360.
PlayStation3 has good graphics, controls, and all that, but I like the different array of games the XBOX360 provides.

Stoie
offline
Stoie
93 posts
Nomad

PS3 is a far superior console and still has its share of exclusive games (despite the fact FF has sold its soul *cries*) and as soon as a few games are made to use the full capabilities of the PS3 (Crysis is coming soon for 1) then those games alone will blast the 360 out of the water. And the Sony online thing is much better than the 360's "thou must pay for every little thing" mentality!

Graham
offline
Graham
8,047 posts
Nomad

1. Xbox360 is more expensive in the long run
2. Ps3 has more games
3. You can't compare graphics if they're games for both console because ps3 has to be lowered to 360's standards

for the 1st one
xbox is like 100$ now and ps3 is 400$ for 80 gig
ps3 is a 10 year system so i am assuming 360 is too
it is 50 dollars a year for 360 online
10x50 = 500
500+console+repairs= way higher than ps3

for the 2nd
ps3 plays all games from ps1-ps3
all the gigs can use them because there's free system data in the playstation store to make your ps3 capatible
xbox has 2 gens of games
ps3 has 3

for the 3rd
it's like comparing gamecube games with ps2
(i have both)
now, comparing time splitters 2 on GC and Mercinaries on Ps2
Mercinaries is better because it isn't available for GC

lil_gangsta72
offline
lil_gangsta72
373 posts
Nomad

i have to go with the 360

CerealkillerX
offline
CerealkillerX
237 posts
Nomad

graham the only problem is, that thats only the american version.
the standard european version can only play ps3 games. you could get one for a long time ago that could, back when i couldnt afford one, but well thats the game.

i think exclusive games are the worst piece of crap ever.
why the hell cant you just publish it on both consoles it much better for the gamers. i dont have both consoles, and i have never tryed HALO 3, even though im a huge fan, completed both and halo 2 was so sorryass bad that it was a challenge.

masterofallgame
offline
masterofallgame
70 posts
Nomad

dam it theres like 100 threads for this! there both good systems and well designed everybodys got a prefrance but shut up about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IAMMERCY
offline
IAMMERCY
305 posts
Nomad

EVERYONE SAYIN PS3 WELL I SAY 360!!! CUZ OF THE LARGE AND DIVERSE ONLINE COMMUNITY AND GAMEPLAY

JoyLord
offline
JoyLord
42 posts
Nomad

PS3!!!!!!!!

XBlackKnightX
offline
XBlackKnightX
69 posts
Peasant

XBOX 360

Showing 16-30 of 46