yeah thats normall whats funny is that starting the iraqu war was AFTER they flew planes into our biuldings. (idiot)
First of all, learn to spell. Second, we started the war because we wanted to get Saddam out of power (who knows for what reason) and awe continue it in the interest of oil companies. If we stay in Iraq for a while longer, we can have easy access to the oil that is there. Yes, there is more oil other places, but we have easy access currently to Iraq.
As for the terrorist thing, I could cite so many Christian terrorists from inside the USA. Their already here, and they already believe, so no worries on your part.
Don't even get me started. China has always had a pretty strong grasp on the world, but yes, in recent years they have fallen a part a little. But look at them now. They are going to overtake the US, and we can do nothing to stop them.
As for screwing ourselves over, we will do just as bad with McCain as with Obama. Yes, Obama isn't the best idea, but neither is McCain. Neither is Hillary or Palin or Biden or any of those politicians. We need to start anew, and the only way we can do that is to dismantle the USA.
Personally, all this religious prejudice (Bible Belt) and political pushing really sets me off. That is why I'm moving out ASAP to some nice place like Japan or Great Britain.
Second, we started the war because we wanted to get Saddam out of power (who knows for what reason)
beacuse he gassed the kurds with chemical weapons idiot
and awe
YOU SPELLED WE WRONG!!!!!
continue it in the interest of oil companies. If we stay in Iraq for a while longer, we can have easy access to the oil that is there. Yes, there is more oil other places, but we have easy access currently to Iraq.
common liberal argument. please share why the gass prices increased if bush stole all the oil, (hes a bad man).
As for the terrorist thing, I could cite so many Christian terrorists from inside the USA. Their already here, and they already believe, so no worries on your part.
How about not just people, but entire groups also?
Army of God - Anti-abortion terrorists Lambs of Christ - Anti-abortion terrorists KKK - Simple white-supremacy group, starting a come back as it seems James Charles Kopp - Killed an abortion doctor, affiliated with Lambs of Christ Mike Bray - Accused of destroying womens' health (read: abortion) clinics
If you want links, I will post, but be warned, some of the sites are graphics.
As for the gas thing, Bush is but a pawn to some of these companies. He probably wants to stay in Iraq because of his own judgment, and I respect that.
The one of the reasons we wanted Saddam out was because he might've had WMDs, which we found wasn't true. The Kurd gassing happened in the 80's. I'd think George H. W. Bush would've stepped in, but he had enough foresight to realize that if we went in, we would be becoming a cornerstone in Iraq, like we are now.
And stop putting words in my mouth. I never said Bush is a bad man, I never said Bush is stealing oil. Here is the deal - OPEC is the regulator of how much oil is produced, therefore they decide the prices (supply and demand). They have decided to make oil prices rise and drop, along with production (they recently reduced the amount of oil produced actually). It doesn't really matter if the oil companies get their hands on the oil areas now, because they can only use it in a couple of years. If we really wanted to keep oil prices low, and they currently are lower than in places like Italy, then we should be rushing to develop alternate fuel sources, that way there isn't that much of a demand for oil.
I don't think there will be, at least for a long time. Because Christianity is such a fundamental part of the United States. It would be nice, if we had some one with different views in the White house. Of course they would have to be a very respectful and accepting person. But I doubt it will happen anytime soon.
The question is first, will a non-Christian be nominated by one of the major parties, and secondly will the American people elect him (or her). The question to the first is yes. Mit Romney was, for a long time, the leading candidate for the Republican nomination (by far the most Christian party). If a non-Christian can be nominated, then eventually there will be a non-Christian president.
