Forums → Games → COD Gone too far?

i just realized that, that is kinda weird

well the franchise is being shared by two different companies.Every game they make they will switch over and give the other franchise their turn in making the next game in the series.COD4 was made by I believe Activision,where as this next one will be made by Treyarch.The point is COD4 was made by a different company,so they couldn't do that.Now why is it like that?I have no clue,b/c I never really bothered researching it,but that is why they are doing this.Also Activision tends to make the better ones of the series for some reason,even though all of the games share the same engines as the last ones,unless they are upgrading it to a new game console,in which case they will have to upgrade the system,so Treyarch is pretty much mooching off of the work of Activision and putting in a generic WW2 theme to it instead of modern day.Next thing you know they will have it put in the near future or something.Anyways I think I just about covered everything I could on this topic.I am done now.

cod is a good game but they rele need to do something with the timeline like seriously

crimsonblade:
activision is the owner of the brand, including the two companies who make the games.
the company that made cod4 was infinity ward, who is claimed to be the most succesfull ones, dealing with more nationalfeeling and spirit than trearch, whos games are far from as good.
trearch are making cod5

why do they keep making cod games? arent they all the same?

far from it mate. the cod games are ussually based on the same principle yes, but they are focused on a lone persons opinion of the war, and the areas that its happening in.
allthough its been 3 WWII games, theres are still half a million of battles that are untouched by COD. they have only scratched the surfice.
the beatifull thing is, that they take opinions of nearly all sites of the war.
in cod2 you play as a russian private in stalinggrad, fighting off the nazi menace, an english sergeant, fighting in the sands of northern africa(and a tankcommander in a single act), and as an american corporal, pushing onto the beach of omaha on dday.
thouse are only 3 battles... there are millions more

lol age of war.

I think they should make a more tactical one.

I aggre and if they dont go to R6V2. And if they can get away with milkng of COD then why cant halo?

It would be funny if Bungie made a Bungie Jr and made another halo.

I will laugh if that happens.

more squad commands would be good. Or, you could be part of a squad. Not the leader. that'd be cool. COD has gone too far but it can still repair this mess=Make more awsome games

They should make something else something different

NOT A WORLDWAR1-2 GAME

Call of duty should stop full stop

They are making this train go way to far..

I hated COD 4...And I thought COD 3 was alright

But COD 2 was the original and the best

Im glad COD 5 is coming out in WW 2 but lets hope that you can play as the badguys this time!

Oh and get rid of the bad rank system on COD 4 -.-

i agree the best CODs are WWII CODs.They should make only ones in that time.They are making great games,COD is best FPS ever.They shouldnt stop

You cant play as German.Ow shit.Only as American(vs Japanese)and Russian(vs German.Yeeeehhhaaa).pacific and eastern front campagins