again, in Warefare you must think of a way to destroy the enemy. you actually need to think about defense, offense, support units, and that why its much more fun!!!! i dont know how anybody else would like age of war better!! it wasnt such an incredible game first of all!!! hope they create another warefare im dying for another one!!!!!
I like warfare 1997 alot better. In fact I don't even like age of war. I personally think it sucks. Your enemies have way too much money, and you can never inflict any damage on them. It's just too hard. I have no idea how it got a 9+ rateing.
In my opinion, Warfare 1917 is better, I'll list what I evaluated to tell you the one I prefer.
- Warfare 1917 has missions! In Age of War, you just stay in the same map for the whole game, just trying to destroy the other side. +1 for Warfare 1917
- In Age of War, you lack of moving space... it get kinda annoying after a bit, while in Warfare 1917 you get long a and sweet maps to deploys your units. +1 for Warfare 1917
- I like the music in Warfare 1917, but I think the one in Age of War is better because Warfare 1917 is too repetitive, always with the same beat so it get boring after a bit, while Age of War's music get differents beat, diffenrent music speeds, so take more time before your so tired of it that you close the sound :P at least, that's my opinion. +1 Age of War
- I think that Warfare 1917 is more strategic because of the different special attacks, the trenches, and also, the different units bonus! While in Age of War, the only thing that vary from an unit to another, is the attack (ranged, melee and a kind of tank). +1 Warfare 1917
Well, that's my opinion, and I think I compared most of the important points, if I forgot any, well.. please tell me and I'll try to add it
