But here's the question: Why does Warlords: Heroes have a lower rating than Achilles? Warlords as 4 stories, more weapons, more upgrades, more modes, more enemies, more bosses, better gameplay, better everything. So why does Achilles have a 8.9, and Warlords 8.6? Well, the answer is simple: Spammers
Achilles was published on AG at a time where there weren't as many spammers. People actually rated the games based on how good they were, and not for AP. Well, now, people rate games JUST for AP. And Warlords is living proof. People clicked on the new game on the front page, thinking "Ooo! 2 more AP for me!" and rated the game a 1. Or a 2. Any thing there mouse reached first. 75% of the people probably didn't play the game before rating it.
What I'm basically saying here is: AG is getting spammier by the minute.
|||75% of the people probably didn't play the game before rating it. What I'm basically saying here is: AG is getting spammier by the minute.|||
you are right anyway the achilles story envolved me more and in achilles you could throw spears Achilles was the first AG game that i played and it is my favourite still
well thats the problem, there is no way to see if they really played it. If it had to be open for say...5 minutes they would open multiple games, then rate them.
But there is no way to actually know if they played it. They could have just opened it, let it load, and then rated it.
Yeah... But that's all I got.
Well, that really screws people around not many people would be bothered to do that.
well thats the problem, there is no way to see if they really played it. If it had to be open for say...5 minutes they would open multiple games, then rate them.
