ForumsWEPRCreationism vs evolution

44 6373
samy
offline
samy
4,871 posts
Nomad

Ok this seems like a topic that can be opened to a wide range of debates so here we go.

Also i'm a die hard creationist if any body wants to try and prove me completly wrong and im no responding please just comment me

  • 44 Replies
ShintetsuWA
offline
ShintetsuWA
3,137 posts
Nomad

You cannot have Evolution with Creationism, because the creationism does not support Evolution. On the contrary, Evolution is completely against Creationism. If you believe in Creationism, you believe everything poofed up thousands of years ago all in 7 days.

Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,656 posts
Jester

I believe in something controling the evolution. What is that called, then? "Crealution?"

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,351 posts
Farmer

If you believe in Creationism, you believe everything poofed up thousands of years ago all in 7 days.


To correct you it was not POOFED up it was created by GOD in 7 days.
Imagirlygirl
offline
Imagirlygirl
91 posts
Nomad

exactly

ShintetsuWA
offline
ShintetsuWA
3,137 posts
Nomad

yes, it was created by God, thousands of years ago, in 7 days.

Earth is a couple billion years old. Now say that he created the heavens and the earth on the first day. Check. You expect me to believe that he created man 5 days later when Man came hundreds of million years later??

Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,656 posts
Jester

No. I just say that there is a possibility that something intelligent pushed life in the right direction.

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,351 posts
Farmer

Earth is a couple billion years old.


Do you really belive the earth is billions years old?
The earth is 6,000 years old position. The date 4004 B.C. is found in the marginal notes (Genesis one) of many King James Versions. This date was first placed in the King James Version by James Ussher in 1701. He arrived at this date by adding the lengths of the lives of the patriarchs as given in Genesis 5 and 11. In reality, this dating method is not infallible for a number of possible reasons. As far as the Bible is concerned, we can not date the earth with accuracy. It must be remembered that Genesis presents the earth as being created mature or aged (Gen. 1: 20 ff.).
ShintetsuWA
offline
ShintetsuWA
3,137 posts
Nomad

lol I wasn't disproving you Cenere I was disproving someone else XD

Now for your theory Cenere that's some form of Scientology, where a highly-intelligent race created us through mutated genes and DNA. Who's to say that is a good theory there? Even though it isn't the most popular of explanations, it still gets a merit point.

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,351 posts
Farmer

The earth is 4.7 billions years old view. Scientists have employed a number of methods in trying to arrive at the age of the earth. The rate of erosion, rate of salt accumulation in the ocean, and the rate of decay of certain elements such as uranium, thorium, potassium, and rubidium. All of these methods including the "ore method," "meteorite method," and the dating of fossil remains are unreliable and contain many attendant variables.

Craze77
offline
Craze77
811 posts
Peasant

Creationism is true, not evolution.

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,351 posts
Farmer

Very simple put thank you Craze.

ShintetsuWA
offline
ShintetsuWA
3,137 posts
Nomad

Do you really belive the earth is billions years old?


Science proves it so. A very smart man whose name I cannot remember was studying geology. He concluded that the rock patterns in the ground, such as mountains and canyons couldn't have been formed thousands of years ago, it would have to be at least hundreds of million years. And another thing, we have many layers of rock and magma in the earth right now. Dinosaur remains are buried so deep into the ground that scientists have concluded that the remains are hundreds of million of years old, by form of Carbon Dating.
Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,656 posts
Jester

Oh, no, not scientology, They do not make sense!
Just wondering how it could be that the universe is just as it should be, and that everything fits into a mathematic line. Exect a few things, of course.
Also very detailed designs of organs an such.

necromancer
offline
necromancer
750 posts
Peasant

The earth is 4.7 billions years old view. Scientists have employed a number of methods in trying to arrive at the age of the earth. The rate of erosion, rate of salt accumulation in the ocean, and the rate of decay of certain elements such as uranium, thorium, potassium, and rubidium. All of these methods including the "ore method," "meteorite method," and the dating of fossil remains are unreliable and contain many attendant variables.


Show me strong scientific proof that these variables create inaccuracies. Atomic clocks have a variance of 1/100th of a second every million years, atomic motion is incredibly precise and atomic decay happens at stable rates. Meteor methods are very exact in their time frame because the matter in them formed into meteor at the same time our solar system was forming. The Earth is approximately the same age as the meteors.

"The earth is 6,000 years old position. The date 4004 B.C. is found in the marginal notes (Genesis one) of many King James Versions. This date was first placed in the King James Version by James Ussher in 1701. He arrived at this date by adding the lengths of the lives of the patriarchs as given in Genesis 5 and 11. In reality, this dating method is not infallible for a number of possible reasons. As far as the Bible is concerned, we can not date the earth with accuracy. It must be remembered that Genesis presents the earth as being created mature or aged (Gen. 1: 20 ff.)."

I love that you use someone's interpretation of a book that condoned slavery and has multiple flaws in light of scientific facts as a justification of your position; so flawed.
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,351 posts
Farmer

Soory I kind of lost you in the begining there man

Showing 16-30 of 44