Forums → Games → Call of Duty: World at War

call of duty is stupid and repeats the same war.

here is a cool Video on cod waw

I own cod:wow on 360, and i love it. COD has always been my kind of game, the only drawback being its super short campaign. But when each level looks like it did, i can understand why it was short. Multiplayer wasnt as fun as cod4, but is still more than entertaining. I wish there were more multiplayer achievements. Theres no way i will ever get some of the veteran level achievements. Other than those few gripes, 9/10.

they need to stop using the same war. How many games can you really make about the same thing with out it getting old. at least modern warfare is a different war.

This was a completely different perspective though. The russian campaign anyways.

I have it,but it is nothing great.

Givemeyoursoul, well what other war would they do, not the same as modern warfare. WWI would'nt be fun and Vietnam was so short.

[quote]i dont get it.....

call of duty is stupid and repeats the same war

I almost cried when you had to choose to save Roebuck or Polonsky in US marines campaign!

oh and did anybody like how you get shot in the very end and what's with the zombie lvl????!!!!

I played COD:4 religiously and loved it to bits. I know COD:WAW isn't COD:5 but it's still the next in the series and I don't see any inprovements other than getting to call in the dogs. Maybe I'm still getting used to it (god I hope so) but I think it's poor compared to COD:4

I agree with dee4life the only good part is calling in the dogs. everything else is terrible. COD: World at War is so poor compared to COD4.

I love COD WAW, I have it and i never get bored even though I beat it all, I like COD World At War better than COD Modern Warfare.

oh and did anybody like how you get shot in the very end and what's with the zombie lvl????!!!!