First off, It is spelled Call of Duty 5. Secondly, the proper name for it is Call of Duty: World at War. Thirdly, I just hate it don't even get me started. Call of Duty 4 was the bomb it was so awesome. But then, they had to go back to stupid World War 2 stuff and now a lot of people like me are really mad! Oh yea, by the way it would be proper if you actually said if you like it or not on your thread. Sorry, I really didn't mean to flame your thread.
I love it, I have it.I beat the whole game to it, and yes you can kill zombies, I don't like killing them, creeps me out when they pop out of no where.
It is just like COD 4 but worse. COD 4 was great and they just had to go make a fifth one. It is just like the fourth one but with japanese people and like 3 more guns. Btw whats the point of zombies in a COD game?
I don't like it! Somehow they actually managed to make the graphics worse than COD4 and there is almost no different feel from the gameplay in COD4. It wasn't made by the same company, maybe thats why it's not as good.
Who made it. I think that the company that made the fourth one said COD 4 should be the last and then another company came along and said well we think that there meeds to be another one for no reason.
managed to make the graphics worse than COD4
and it is glitchy. You would think that would be there main concern. There is one difference Different people and guns.
Yeah it would be cool, but what war do they have left to use cause I am pretty sure that they have gotten every one so far. Maybe they can do one on the Iraq war.
Thats along the same lines as cod 4. Im thinking they either need to go vietnam(although its previously been done, and not very well for that matter) or concentrate on a specific theater in wwii. In my opinion, on cod:waw the russian campaign was awesome, for it was something new. When it switched over to japan, while it was a little different(ie. weapons and different locations), it still felt familiar. And say if someone did a game completely on the russians they could make a couple more levels where you were on artillary, making a bombing run, or in a dogfight.
What is better about it? The graphics are worse than the ones on COD 4, the people you fight are basically the same but with different names. On the case to the game it says it has multiplayer and it doesn't. I don't want to flame the game but I have to to make my point. Tell me what the differences are in COD 5 than in COD 4.
it is awesome (even the cheats like turning ur enemeys into the purple dinosaur) and awesome graphics and weps (even the old ones) and the enemy's are a lot easier (and harder ) to beat
