Forums → The Tavern → BCS National Championship

Ummmm.. ya, there freaking beast. Idk, watched some of the first half and they were rolling down the field.

Its obvious there were going to beat Missouri, but do they deserve to be in the big game?

Yes, playing their games, winning them. Why wouldnt' they deserve it, they did earn it.

What about Texas though? They sure didnt win that one. And the only reason they advanced ahead was a rule in the big12. The big12 being the only conference in the land with a rule like this one.

Well if they are playing Florida, then yes of course they deserve so be in the match.

I'm a die hard Texas fan, and you know I was pissed at this one. Texas beat Oklahoma, thus it should have put Texas ahead. I'm pretty sure Texas had a schedule that was just as hard as Oklahoma's. It only makes sense that you should a team first that would make a better game. Texas could have won by at least 2 more touchdowns.

It should be USC against Oklahoma. Just my opinion.

USC is good, but their loss came against oregon state. Although state almost won the Pac10, theyre really not that good, especially now that theyve lost rodgers.

I do think that texas kinda of got the shaft, but only to a certain degree. Strength of schedule went to the sooners, but texas did have that heads up win. If the horns only wouldve got it done against texas tech there would be no question about it.