AGS Steam Games

Forums → WEPR → Legal & Illegal

8 1983
arkaninerenegade
offline
arkaninerenegade
785 posts
Nomad

Ok this is how it goes. You post something that is currently legal or illegal, then you say why it should be legal or illegal.

Example: Violent video games are legal.

Response 1: Violent video games should be illegal since some people do crimes because of them.

or

Response 2: Violent video games should remain legal since they make up a small fraction of violence.

Then you write a new one and the person below you answer.

Also please explain.


Here's the first one:

Alcohol.

  • 8 Replies
Buddha9001
offline
Buddha9001
2 posts
Nomad

Alcohol should be legal because everyone loves to drink.

Scientology.

iPC
offline
iPC
146 posts
Nomad

Scientology should be legal because making it illegal would restrict people's freedom of religion and wouldn't do anything helpful.

Eating dogs is legal. (but frowned upon)

Aaroniscool
offline
Aaroniscool
254 posts
Nomad

Eating a dog should be considered legal but highly monitored.

If you needed something to eat and you see a wild dog. Kill it and eat it.

Pet dogs are another story...

The right to bear arms

Aaroniscool
offline
Aaroniscool
254 posts
Nomad

Eating a dog should be considered legal but highly monitored.

If you are in the wild needed something to eat and you see a wild dog. Kill it and eat it.

Pet dogs are another story...

The right to bear arms


sry, had to fix something.
Parsat
offline
Parsat
2,180 posts
Blacksmith

People should have the right to bear arms in self-defense, but it needs to be more restricted to avoid giving it to people who might not use it for such a purpose.

Owning a ferret.

Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,300 posts
Nomad

I assume this is not the forum for rebuttal, and that's five minutes I will never see again.

Owning a ferret should be legal because... why not?

tanstaafl28
offline
tanstaafl28
335 posts
Farmer

Xzeno, you broke the chain...I shall mend the link.

Owning a ferret is legal because besides being small, furry, and smelly, they do not pose a direct threat to public health.

Making bad sequels to great movies.

crazjayz
offline
crazjayz
243 posts
Nomad

Making bad sequels to great movies should be illegal, yet it will never be known if the movie is bad if it's never made (according to the viewpoint of the entire populace). There needs to be some all-knowing automated system that rates movies and their sequels. For example, there should be no Bloodsport 2.

Next up: Setting speed limits on freeways.

Showing 1-8 of 8