cod 5 is only good because of the zombie survival once you have finished that campaign. I got to level 11 with my friend!!! if you know what I'm talking about.
Cod4 because of the wider and most likely to actually to be used (the flame thower is sweet but think, in a battle for your life would you use it) weapons. i also dont like how cod went back to ww2
I say COD4 since it's much better all around. Also, with the amount of WWII era games out, they get repetative. A modern era game is much more exciting.
COD4- Not Online: Its a very good story line involving modern day things with extreme warfare at hand, not only that you can see all the terrorism and junk, and the plot can be much more connective to your own thinking as now the human child (When thinking about war) things of bombs and AK-47's. Back then it would be your regular SMG =P
COD4 - Online: Better weapons, and the scope options are WAY better (Thus making it funner) and you have other things that give you a better option of what you want to do.
COD5's : Not good, Relativeley good CONNECTION status, but the Weapons suck, the scope/aiming options suck, again, and you don't have as many choices. The Flamethrower is a sweet add-on, but its virtually useless and the crazy pump of it dies down after the first few tries.
COD5's Not online: Your regular, obvious, WWII story that we've all seen and heard, nothing new, goes back to history books, old weapons, old plots, old everything. ....Rubbish.
Though I have to say there are many really good WWII games, I personally enjoyed Airborne.
Lol erm... i think COD5 because of the zombie thing and because i think that online is much better, also i really like how sub automatic guns are actually good in COD5
i got 5 today i beat it today also it does have a better story than cod4 but there are many wwii vds instead of going back they should have done call of duty 5: FUTURE WARFARE and the should have had activision do it instead of the guys who created the other 3
