They didn't even need the system they used for this comparison, what's the point in playing these games at 1920x1200 if you are just going to downscale them to 720p for comparison? You are going to show off PC performance advantages by forcing it down to the consoles playing field? That's like comparing gaming PCs 512mb vram Vs consoles 256mb vram; but only using games built around consoles 256mb.
They should have used a mid range gaming computer for this comparison, something with a dual core and a 9800GT for example. Even then there would have been visual advantages demonstrated on PC; without is seeming to only come from a top of the line machine.
This is not settled at all. The pc might have alittle betetr grpahics , but the gamplay is horrible.
It does settle the graphics for the 360 and PS3, you can ignore the PC totally if you want -
- and it is fair with it being scaled down - Its like a maths equation - do the same to both sides and they will stay as they were to begin with in comparison to each other
So many haters. So the ps3 edges the 360 by a slim margin, does that mean its overall a better system? Thats like saying a new chevy cobalt and lambo gallardo are about the same because theyre both shiny and smell new.
well.. PS3 has blue ray and good graphics.. but is the gameplay of the games any good?? with the xbox 360, you have giid graphics, GREAT GAMES!! and the online play is much better.. soooo XBOX 360 FTW!!!
