Forums → Games → WARFARE 1917 2 OR MEAT BOY 2?

1917

I say Meat Boy 2, that game is so addicting.

I never really got any joy from playing Warfare 1917 so I'd have to go with Meatboy 2 even though getting the band-aids are so frustrating (and I mean all)...

Ofcourse warfare 1917

Definitely Warfare 1917 2! If ConArtists will make a sequel to the first one

come on meat boy is bad

obiously is warfare

warfare 2? would that be about ww2 then? so it would be called something like 1940

warfare 1917 duhhhhhhh

I guess I'll say warfare 1917 "2", just so I'll fit in.
Though I'd prefer to see meatboy 2 come out.

warfare 2? would that be about ww2 then? so it would be called something like 1940

To firetail_madness:first off ww2 didnt start until 1939...and thats all i have to say didnt read post after so if someone already corrected him than srry.Back on topic:Warfare 1917 tottaly...needs to be longer tho...and i would enjoy a sequel like adding diseases if ur troops stay in trench long like "Trench Foot" and "Cat Rats" eye view report rats the size of house cats....

Warfare 1917 is good game, but if there should made a new warfare game it should have difrent name. Maybe Warfare 1918 :P

There is a Meat Boy 2, called Meat Boy (map pack), but that game is very, very, hard, MUCH harder than the first.
I say Warfare 1917 2.

I would say Meat Boy 2

Warefare 1917 2 i think is better, never really played meat boy any ways