ForumsThe TavernWhat millitary group is better ARMY or MARINES

37 7057
rob132
offline
rob132
78 posts
Nomad

i think is the marines cause they have better uniforms they go into battle first and my brother is a marine in afghanistan

  • 37 Replies
knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

Uh, sorry for the misunderstanding.

Fritz_Rublehem
offline
Fritz_Rublehem
1,076 posts
Nomad

Countries need the two to be used effectively and to become sucessful in military campaigns. Not one branch is more important than the other.

Fyrefox
offline
Fyrefox
2,120 posts
Farmer

Marines are just elite soldiers from an Army.
What I meant to say was [i]
Marine are just elite soldiers fight for a country.
Not one branch is more important than the other.

It seems like almost all of us have reached this agreement.
MudPuddle
offline
MudPuddle
270 posts
Templar

The term 'Marine' does not imply elite. It simply means soldiers who fight from either on (long ago) or from a ship. The original core mission of the Marine Corp. was amphibious landings, though they haven't done so in combat since WW II.

As to 'the few', yes, they are much smaller then the Army. If you are talking about total force, versus total force, the Marines wouldn't be able to put up much of a fight.

Individually, they are a pretty tough lot though.

If you want 'elite' however, you need to look at the Green Beret, Delta Force, and the Rangers, among others. The most impressive special force in he U.S. military however is the SEALS, from the Navy.

As to which is most important, my personal opinion is the Army. They all have an important function, (except the Marines, which have been redundant for about a century) but the Army, in my opinion, is the most vital.

Of the branches of the Army, the most important is often the most over looked, the Infantry. Regardless of what you do, without these guys, you haven't taken anything, just ground things up, or mashed them flat.

knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

The term 'Marine' does not imply elite. It simply means soldiers who fight from either on (long ago) or from a ship. The original core mission of the Marine Corp. was amphibious landings, though they haven't done so in combat since WW II.

As to 'the few', yes, they are much smaller then the Army. If you are talking about total force, versus total force, the Marines wouldn't be able to put up much of a fight.

Individually, they are a pretty tough lot though.

If you want 'elite' however, you need to look at the Green Beret, Delta Force, and the Rangers, among others. The most impressive special force in he U.S. military however is the SEALS, from the Navy.

As to which is most important, my personal opinion is the Army. They all have an important function, (except the Marines, which have been redundant for about a century) but the Army, in my opinion, is the most vital.

Of the branches of the Army, the most important is often the most over looked, the Infantry. Regardless of what you do, without these guys, you haven't taken anything, just ground things up, or mashed them flat.


I do understand your point MudPuddle.

The United States Marine Corps serves as an amphibious force-in-readiness. As outlined in 10 U.S.C. § 5063, and originally introduced under the National Security Act of 1947, it has three primary areas of responsibility:

* "The seizure or defense of advanced naval bases and other land operations to support naval campaigns;
* the development of tactics, technique, and equipment used by amphibious landing forces; and
* such other duties as the President may direct."


I got that from here on Wikipedia
CubanFrog
offline
CubanFrog
479 posts
Nomad

Marines because they have harder training.

Showing 31-36 of 37