What's faux news? New channel, I ain't never heard of it.
It's my way of spelling Fox News. Faux (though pronounced "foe" looks like the word "Fox." It also means "false" or "fake." Thus, I consider Fox News to be false.
I'm not saying one gun, I'm saying multiple errors. Honestly, don't believe what you hear on Fox News. I haven't seen that on any other news channel.
It's my way of spelling Fox News. Faux (though pronounced "foe" looks like the word "Fox." It also means "false" or "fake." Thus, I consider Fox News to be false.
Because everywhere else is liberal and there for against people protecting themselves. And listman, prove that fox news is fake. Everywhere else is true? Wrong! If Fox news is wrong, then everywhere else is to.
Nope. Many places are way less biased than Fox, and therefore closer to the whole truth. ------------ List three liberal news stations and why, and I'll believe you. T_T
Nope. Many places are way less biased than Fox, and therefore closer to the whole truth. ------------ List three liberal news stations and why, and I'll believe you. T_T
Ok. I'll go in order of liberalness.
1. CNN, very liberal. They hate conservatives and have a tendancy to think obamas a god.
2. MSN, liberal. They seem to think that somebody losing 30 pounds that's famous is news.
3. NBC, slightly liberal. SAA.
4. Fox, slightly conservative. Gives quite fair statments and has both sides.
Misconceptions. CNN is very biased. MSN is somewhat biased. NBC is slightly biased. fox is very biased.
CNN MSN NBC center Fox | | | | | liberal neutral conservative
Fox is much more biased than you think it is, because of your conservative views. I see both CNN and Fox to be equally biased, just on opposite sides of the aisle.
FOR GOD'S SAKE, FOX NEWS IS NOT A RELIABLE ENOUGH SOURCE TO USE FOR SERIOUS CITATION! IT IS TOO BIASED! How about some REAL proof please.
Ummmm...so is every other news channel out there (except C-SPAN). Plus, you are being a hypocrite, you are being biased against Fox, claiming that they are not reliable just because you are a Libby.
Ummmm...so is every other news channel out there (except C-SPAN). Plus, you are being a hypocrite, you are being biased against Fox, claiming that they are not reliable just because you are a Libby.
1st. I never said other news wasn't biased, just that Fox was too much so. 2nd. I am not a liberal; I am a political moderate. 3rd. Before you call someone a hypocrite, make sure your claim is valid. PHAIL!
Seriously? Are you wanting wanting to get a beat down?
Internet showdown! Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnnn! ----------- I think that you just need evidence to substantiate your claim that this statistic was purposefully distorted by liberals.
1st. I never said other news wasn't biased, just that Fox was too much so. 2nd. I am not a liberal; I am a political moderate. 3rd. Before you call someone a hypocrite, make sure your claim is valid. PHAIL!
Have you ever heard of logic? No? Lemme teach it to you. (I will say this slowly so you can understand).
Have you ever heard of logic? No? Lemme teach it to you. (I will say this slowly so you can understand).
Actually, before I decided to be against Fox, I actually watched them for a while and made the decision afterward. Ever heard of making sure you can substantiate a claim before you make it? I'll explain this slowly so you can understand. You-thought-that-I-had-baseless-bias-against-Fox. You-were-wrong. Your-claim-was-therefore-invalid. I-thought-before-becoming-biased-against-Fox. You-assumed-I-didn't. Assuming-makes-an-ass-out-of-u-and-me. PHAIL! (God, this is becoming a phailstorm! On both sides.)
