Say there is a baby that can save the world from poverty, right. Right!?! Theres a catch though. The baby can only like use its powers when like when a nation decides to sacrifice itself. So like lets say there was this war.
Its a civil war that breaks out in a nation. Both defend their side right> So like the northern south side wants to like get rid of the baby. And the eastern west thinks it is justified to sacrifice a majority of the humanity to save a larger majority.
Well, see, if the Northern wants to destroy it, and the Eastern doesn't, then...there is really no room for negotiations, the North would be like, "If you guys want to save someone save us! we are more important!" And the East would disagree...
I don't see how the name of this thread relates to the topic...
And what are you asking us? I think that it would definitely be a dilemma, but then again through Civil War they would probably destroy each other anyway. Not sure if that would count as sacrifice though.
Where did you come up with this? Anyway, I wouldn't sacrifice a nation to stop POVERTY. Don't forget, they're poor but alive. The nation you'd sacrifice would kill everyone.