ForumsWEPRWouldn't Hurt A Fly

34 6764
Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,301 posts
Nomad

Just some crazy 'food-for-thought' topic.

-------------------------------------

I sit at a desk, studying for a class I never wanted to take. I am concentrating on deciphering yet another passage when it happens again. I hear a fly buzz past my ear. This fly has been harrying me all evening. Be it by buzzing startlingly, landing on me, or landing on my food. I swat at the fly, curse it, and continue my work. Soon, it begins to buzz again. This time, it buzzes right up to the desk and lands. It begins to rub its front legs together the way flies do. I raise my book to put it out of my misery. But then I pause.

----------------------------------------------------

Should I kill this fly? Its only crime has been to mildly inconvenience me. Who am I to hand out such a punishment for such a crime? It never even tried to annoy me; its very nature is what bugs me. Can I kill a creature because it unintentionally annoys me? Is its relative insignificance justification enough for this act? Should I kill a mouse for the same offense? What about a cat? A dog? A man?

----------------------------------------------

During my moment of hesitation and contemplation, the fly buzzed off, never to bother me again. Maybe it got the message.

  • 34 Replies
GamesArmor
offline
GamesArmor
890 posts
Nomad

Wow that made me think! My head hurts now! LOL

Anyways, wow. Is a fly worth killing even if it borthers you? I kill bugs because I don't like them in my house. I dunno what to think. Is a fly worth letting live? Or a brainless(not literally) insect?

Strop
offline
Strop
10,816 posts
Bard

I've thought about this before.

Can I kill a creature because it unintentionally annoys me?


Well, Hannibal Lecter has something to say about this :P

More seriously, I think of insecticide in terms of ecological balances. Bugs that get killed because they are either a) eaten b) poisoned c) crushed can be callously (but specifically) thought of as collateral runoff. I would justify such a viewpoint by saying that this is a feature of their ecological niche.

Whereas the features of other species, including humanity's ecological niche is somewhat different, hence debates on the ethics of vegetarianism or even murder etc. have their own relevance to their own distinct arenas.
Blkasp
offline
Blkasp
1,304 posts
Nomad

Should I kill a mouse for the same offense? What about a cat? A dog? A man?


You can kill this fly - They are a pest, there are millions of them.

You can kill a mouse - they eat, no wait Steal your food (if they are doing this)

I wouldn't suggest a cat as they have a smart enough brain to be considered higher than a stupid fly/mouse. Same goes with the Dog.

The Man is definitly a big NO!
MagiX
offline
MagiX
1,015 posts
Nomad

You can kill a mouse - they eat, no wait Steal your food (if they are doing this)


I wouldn't suggest a cat as they have a smart enough brain to be considered higher than a stupid fly/mouse. Same goes with the Dog.


Because they are a bit smarter? A stray dog still rummages for food through the streets if it is hungry.
Zophia
offline
Zophia
9,434 posts
Scribe

I don't think the answers to those questions were the point, Bikasp, but rather the ethics behind them.

No, I don't think being annoyed with a fly is a good enough excuse to kill it.
However, flies do more than being just annoying... If there's enough of them, they'll cover your room in little black spots of their poop. And that's just one thing.

I still leave most fly killing to the spiders, though. They gain more from it than I do.

Strop
offline
Strop
10,816 posts
Bard

Hm, zophia's premise can be summed up as a defence against those who pose a risk. In the case of flies, it's pathogenic spread.

The problem then lies in the fact that competition and threats are part-and-parcel of our very cohabitation. In the case of humans, however, we establish social contracts that seek to minimise this threat, though given unlimited interest in limited resources, breach is inevitable.

That's slightly over-simplistic but should do at this stage.

Xavier1
offline
Xavier1
671 posts
Nomad

I agree with your first post Strop. I mean, people kill flys all the time and they aren't even begining to be endangered. So it must be important to keeping everything in order.

samdawghomie
offline
samdawghomie
3,550 posts
Peasant

Well, Hannibal Lecter has something to say about this :P


Hahaha, I lol'd

But I must agree with your first post. I mean, thousands and thousands of flys are killed every day by spiders and animals and humans every day so how would it effect anyone. And if we didn't do this well, they might overrun human population, then they would be really annoying. And we have to keep everything in the our ecosystem in balence and killing flies is one of those things.
Estel
offline
Estel
1,973 posts
Peasant

And we have to keep everything in the our ecosystem in balence and killing flies is one of those things.

This doesn't hold much ground because humans are the biggest danger to our ecosystem.

I have to say that just one fly isn't important enough to worry about. So sure, swatting a fly is okay in my book. A mouse, same to that. I agree with Bikasp on saying that cats and dogs are smarter. With that being said, should idiotic humans be punished? I know there have to be some people more stupid than animals.
goumas13
offline
goumas13
4,752 posts
Grand Duke

Insects and rats, can be killed, because they can bring illnesses and they can survive even if you kill many of them.

Estel
offline
Estel
1,973 posts
Peasant

Humans spread illnesses as well goumas.

Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

I've thought about this before, and the answer is no, you shouldn't kill it.

But is it acceptable to kill it in our society? Yes.

Humanity for thousands of years has considered itself better than everything else, just because we got lucky and became the dominant species. So because of that we're not going to think about the little things like flies.

goumas13
offline
goumas13
4,752 posts
Grand Duke

Humans spread illnesses as well goumas.

Yes but I don't think that is correct killing people. When you kill a cockroach or a rat is almost self-defense.
Estel
offline
Estel
1,973 posts
Peasant

When you kill a cockroach or a rat is almost self-defense

That is not self defense. More like the cockroach or rat is an inconvenience to you, so you kill it. Now if a rat had a disease of some sort and was going to bite you, then yes, it is okay to kill it. Or if the cockroach was waging nuclear war XP
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Why the f not?

What sets morals then your own mind? Do what you please

Showing 1-15 of 34