So wrong, if he wants to die let him do it on his own
So you think it's ok for someone to kill themselves because they want to? And you think that letting someone be, that wants to kill themselves in a world of people, is the safer route? When extracting man from the environment which is displeasing to him, and taking him into a place where he is disabled from killing himself, or harming others, is actually the dangerous route? I suppose it makes sense. This is coming from the guy whom thinks the jews deserved to be brutally murdered in concentration camps after all.
that IS NOT a mental disorder put it in your head already, some people do everything wrong in life then the life is too hard for them because they are weak.
So it is perfectly sane to want to kill yourself? You know, you appear to be short on temper. I make one post and you seem to have freaked out, when I wasn't addressing you in any way. So they screw up in life, big deal. I have made plenty of mistakes, I don't want to commit suicide. Bah, you know, you talk as though humans are animals.
You saw my point on accident. I can deduct that much. You continue to bicker about what is right and what is wrong. This is philosophy. This is perception. This is how we think. THIS! IS! SPARTAAA!
That this purports to be philosophy means that the thread is asking a moral question.
However this question is so central to the field of ethics that it may be more appropriate to discuss it as such. Especially when mentioning things about laws etc. which are relatively irrelevant to purely philosophical discussions.
I would have thought a suitable phil. topic would have been something like on the nature of being, existence, space and time etc.
Exactly. And what the fuck do you mean strop? That's exactly what i am talking about. Do you need a how to read the forum before making blind assumptions thread? That would be in the newcomers forum. Need help finding that? Click on my name in blue and write a message in the space provided.
Cloud, if you are referring to the post just below yours, you most likely ninja'ed him to it, aka, he was reading thread while you wrote, then concluded like you that people was not getting the point, and started writing, most likely in the moment you posted. He did not write the post to annoy you, or to make a blind assumption, but to help out, since some people on these forums cannot read the part where it says "Philosophy/Philosophical", or simply ignore it, to make jokes of the original question, because they do not care to actually answer the question.
CloudHill's post is so rude and uninformed that I won't dignify it with a proper response. All I'll say is: "blind assumption"...how ironic.
So here's a little public service announcement: This is the kind of level of rudness you display if you want to get banned.
And because people don't seem to understand what moderators do: I will always write responses for the benefit of everybody unless specified otherwise. Just because what I've written goes over your head doesn't mean you should take offense to it.
Not to be rude, but if you were entirely fluent in English, you would also catch some of the tone and construction. It was definitely rude. If you want more examples, just check the user's other posts.
You know what, since the user running this thread is currently "away" for a few days, I'm going to lock this thread.
