Forums → Games → [necro] Warfare 1917 vs 1944

Both were great.
But I'm going to have to go with 1917 because I seem to have more fun with that one...

1944 is better: the reload time is for each unit! There are more upgrades and graphics is better!

1944 is simply better, but i do like the 1917 one, probably because you can be Britain ^^

i like warfare 1944, so much people said so many bad things about warfare 1944 because they are stupid and get understand a few instructions the only bad thing about warfare 1944 is because it has some glithces that ARENT fixed yet

I think 1917 has better story

but 1944 has better custom battle which i play more and slowly work up to work on my skills and thank you loopythales for expressing a point that ive been trying to make on the chatting on that game

I liked both games i won them both in a couple of hours.

I mean Warfare 1944 was challenging and it was harder to get the exact formation of troops and stuff i wanted but it was good.

Warfare 1917 was fun no thought needed at all. Just do.

I personnally like Warfare 1917, even though I am not a big fan of either. It is less challenging and therefore takes less though but it is more fun in my opinion. Warfare 1944 was good, but it lacked the fun aspect for me that the other one had. Personally I tend to like the origional games in most cases, although there are a few instances I can say I like a sequel better.

BOTH ARE GREAT BUT WARFARE 1917 iZ SLiGHTLY BETTER

they are both equally epic! they are great games! and its too hard to decide which i prefer so i say that it's a tie.

I hate 1944. 1917 all the way!

In my opinion, Warfare 1944 lacks the "feel" of it's older brother. I do like gameplay improvements Con added to the sequel. Especially the cover system. He was able to replace the trenches with a cover system. It worked really well.

1917 is much better

1944 due to the improvements made, although 1917 was a good game too

1917 is better. 1944 is so confusing. conartists tried to hard i think