It might or might not exist. It's the study of how life on Earth could have arisen from inanimate matter. In essence, its chemical evolution, but should not be confused with evolution. It says the amino acids, also know as "the building blocks of life" can form via natural chemical reactions unrelated to life. In all living things, these amino acids are organized into proteins, and the construction of these proteins is mediated by nucleic acids. Thus the question of how life on Earth originated is a question of how the first nucleic acids arose. So what do you think of abiogenesis?
I have a question, how do scientists explain how gravity first came to exist. Without their whole theory on the big bang has no base. My theory on the big bang is:
The Big Bang theory makes sense if you know what it actually is. -_-
Also. . .gravity was inside the singularity. Before the Big Bang, it was thought that the four main forces of the Universe, gravity, inertia (I think. . . .), the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force were all linked together, and when the Big Bang happened, they broke apart. Another reason why it would be impossible to explain the Universe pre-Big Bang.
A big bang can only occur if there is a big wang... But any-who, people can argue that God created the Big Bang and all of your fancy-pants scientific mumbo jumbo is trash! Trash I say! I think that one day, huge black holes will take over the universe and then they'll all unite until they are one singularity. After an indefinite amount of time, that singularity will explode!!!
