Hitler. Stalin wasn't really the kind of guy I'd want to get to know. Just a homicidal dictator with nothing else really going for him. And he killed almost more than Hitler. Maybe more. Pretty close. Just over a longer period and much slower. As in more painful slower.
except building all the pretty and famous and fast "autobahn". i would say that this is something.
and if i would have to vote it is a draw between the two guys. both did more evil than anything else, so the world would be better off if both wouldnt ever exist
Stalin is better. He made crimes, but Hitler and his forces committed numerous atrocities during the war, including the systematic killing of as many as 17 million civilians. Stalin was a better leader and he save Russia economy, Hitler tried but he failed.
With Stalin it depends on where your from and with Hitler it depends on what you look like.
do not agree. the nazi regime discriminated and or killed people according to their race(so its a where you from), they had several ideas how eg jews look like so that they can identify them easily. they also had the idea, that a perfect arian(the master race in hitlers eyes) is tall blonde and has blue eyes(worked great for him).
stalin did judge people upon from which class they came. and whether or not you are an enemy of the working class or not.
of course both made exceptions from their general rules and persecuted groups for other reasons.
To the east of Moscow it looked as if Russia was in the middle ages. The people were severely politcally oppressed. However in Moscow, Leningrad, and Stalin Grad, the nation was an industrial superpower. People lived decent lives in Moscow if they behaved the way the government wanted them to.
In Germany, it was just if you're a Jew or not. Opression