ForumsGames*COD *or* HALO*

45 4168
element306
offline
element306
52 posts
Nomad

i think HALO

  • 45 Replies
sense
offline
sense
1,041 posts
Nomad

Call of Duty for sure...

It is way, way, way more realistic, and you have to have more of a idea of what you are doing, and a plan etc. Also, some of the maps are AWESOME!!!!

Imagine a Call of Duty/Halo combined! The realism of Call of Duty + the technology from Halo... Wow.... Amazing...

GTAGuy
offline
GTAGuy
13 posts
Nomad

COD more realalistic than halo


Why this is wrong:
A- Halo 3 may have alliens and stuff in it but it's set in the future, and there's a 1 in 10 chance (10%) that in the next 1000 years we'll discover life on another planet.

B- COD has 'Nazi zombies', yes very realistic, do you really think in the period 1939 - 1945 (WWII) some German guys manage to make zombies(?) Of course not. (Oh and BTW don't give me any of that crap saying 'But Halo has zombies too' No it dosen't 'The Flood' are a parasite, there's a difference)
undertkr666
offline
undertkr666
33 posts
Nomad

halo definitly if u want an easy kill play cod if u want good strategy and work for the kill halo and cod has like a system where your bullets like lock on to the target which is supid and completely not fun halo ftw

TheCheeseMaker
offline
TheCheeseMaker
349 posts
Nomad

COD is the best series of games that i have ever played in my life. Its just incredible!

redx161
offline
redx161
590 posts
Peasant

Halo is unrealalistic. COD is more. I would say Cod its so fun and the new ones coming out MW2 is gonna be AWESOME

RUiiN3D
offline
RUiiN3D
117 posts
Nomad

B- COD has 'Nazi zombies', yes very realistic, do you really think in the period 1939 - 1945 (WWII) some German guys manage to make zombies(?) Of course not. (Oh and BTW don't give me any of that crap saying 'But Halo has zombies too' No it dosen't 'The Flood' are a parasite, there's a difference)

COD has 'Nazi Zombies'? Huh, I don't believe I've ever seen a Zombie on Call Of Duty 4.
Halo has Master Chief a once 6 year old bred into a Super Human which can jump at least 8 feet in the air and who has special health powers, along with regeneration ability when in power armor. Call of Duty: World At War has Nazi Zombies to combat Gears Of War's Horde. I don't think I've ever seen a Zombie throughout the actual Campaign and Online playing Multiplayer Team Deathmatch. What do I see when I'm playing EVERY Halo Variant? A superhuman and aliens having the ability to jump over things a normal human wouldn't ever be able to jump over without certain technology to help them. I'm sorry to those who think Scientology is real, but that's just completely stupid to think. There will never be a spinning quad-pod that can emit a bubble to protect you from certain things and not others.

halo definitly if u want an easy kill play cod if u want good strategy and work for the kill halo and cod has like a system where your bullets like lock on to the target which is supid and completely not fun halo ftw

Again, Call of Duty is REALISTIC, a human will not survive a .50 Cal Bullet to the chest. In Halo I can snipe someone in the chest and they don't die unless they've already been hurt. Also, I can toss a grenade and shoot you once in the head with a BR and you'll die. That takes the equivalent time of shooting someone enough with an MP5 in Non-Hardcore. Want to make it harder on yourself to kill someone? Go play Old School. Double the health.

Call Of Duty is realistic, Halo is Sci-Fi. That's a common fact. Wanna know why? Call of Duty is set in modern time, on EARTH, with HUMANS. Halo's set throughout the universe with super-humans and aliens that can actually survive something normal humans can't.
Nightfox44
offline
Nightfox44
193 posts
Nomad

i don't give a crap about realistic i just like CoDs gameplay better.

Somers
offline
Somers
1,531 posts
Nomad

I seriously dont seem to know why people waste their life on cod. Your doing the same thing over again!? Theres nothing new about it. At least in halo theres custom games, and different gameplay in matchmaking

BladeCrisis
offline
BladeCrisis
22 posts
Nomad

i think halo cuz u can make maps and games and actually play them in cod u cant!

blazeman210
offline
blazeman210
3 posts
Nomad

i own both and they are both really good games halo 3 you can do a bit more than cod waw just my opinion

mki10
offline
mki10
251 posts
Nomad

i think gow better than both of those

Nightfox44
offline
Nightfox44
193 posts
Nomad

wait do you mean gears of war or god of war? well i think gears is better then both but not god...

Destructor79
offline
Destructor79
20 posts
Nomad

COD!!!

florglee2
offline
florglee2
1,780 posts
Peasant

Neither. Halo has the weirdly high jumping, which people base their tactics around, and then try those tactics in other games. I don't know how many times I've seen people try to jump-dodge a rocket in Bad Company, only to catch it square in the gut. And COD is far to overrated, and ridiculously unrealistic. I prefer not to play online (Favorite Game: Fallout 3) but when I do, I go for Gears or Bad Company.

muffinman08
offline
muffinman08
527 posts
Nomad

depends whic cod reall if its cod 4 id say there pretty even but if you mean cod waw then definatley halo, i thought that the only good thing on waw was nazi zombies.

there pretty hard to compare though, cod is more realistic but halo is meant to be sci-fi. i think cod has a better online play but halo has a much funner campaign and appeals to a wider audience

Showing 31-45 of 45

We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing analytics and serving ads.
Learn More