ForumsWEPRNew Evidence of Life on Mars

25 4057
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

I was just surfing newscientist.com, and hit upon an interesting article here.

Apparently, there is new evidence supporting the 1996 claim that fossilized microbes were found in a piece of Mars rock. The claim was dismissed widely until recently, when further investigation proved that the conditions were conducive to life - making the probability much higher for life to have existed in Mars.

  • 25 Replies
Somers
offline
Somers
1,532 posts
Nomad

Interesting...so wheres the little green men thats gonna gimme my hovercraft and an e-wok?

pickleshack
offline
pickleshack
356 posts
Nomad



This is also from newscientist.com. Heard about it on NPR on last Wednesday. It is amazing that the building blocks of life are not only present but seemingly abundant in the universe.

pickleshack
offline
pickleshack
356 posts
Nomad

Sorry, I realize now that I was extremely vague in my last post. I attribute this to exhaustion, the link is about a certain amino acid being found in the dust from a comet.

knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

This is very interesting.

@pickleshack

The article about the comet seems to support another theory.

Interesting...so wheres the little green men thats gonna gimme my hovercraft and an e-wok?


There's no proof that an advanced civilization exists on Mars. Though there is proof that life could exist on Mars.
deserteagle
offline
deserteagle
1,633 posts
Nomad

To me its rather skeptical. Its a pretty big leap to draw conclusions on that.

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

Interesting...but in the end, we're still more interested in looking for intelligient life...oh well, those microbes sure are smarter than some people in the world today >.>

Well, I suppose, better news for Houston if we want to set up a colony. And we do need to soon. If Earth wants to survive, we need to move on to a two planet system at least.

knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

Moving beyond the solar system will be extremely difficult. Though we can expect Mars and the Moon to be harboring humans within our lifetimes.

oh well, those microbes sure are smarter than some people in the world today


Haha.
Somers
offline
Somers
1,532 posts
Nomad

If Earth wants to survive, we need to move on to a two planet system at least.


mind explaining? Why would we need to move? Expandings important, but how could we accomplsih from setting up a colony, on another planet such as the moon or mars living in basically bubbles...how could we achieve anything from that?
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

Moving beyond the solar system will be extremely difficult. Though we can expect Mars and the Moon to be harboring humans within our lifetimes.


Well, not in the near future at any rate. But we do need to expand for resources...and I just saw a documentary on Mars and exploration...

They have new suits...that look like power rangers...which is good, since it's less bulky. But I think it's mroe feasible to colonise the moon first...

Well Somers, we need the space. Earth is simply too cramped, at this rate, we can't support all the new people. And think of all the possible scientific ventures.
Somers
offline
Somers
1,532 posts
Nomad

okay, population isnt such a huge matter though, theres plenty room. but what sort of resources could we inhabit from other planets?

knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

They have new suits...that look like power rangers...which is good, since it's less bulky. But I think it's mroe feasible to colonise the moon first...


I watched that documentary too. I saw those suits, pretty cool. It is more feasible to colonize the Moon first.

but what sort of resources could we inhabit from other planets?


No one really knows, since no human technology has ever approached or landed on an extrasolar planet. Minerals of some sort?
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

Nope, there really isn't enough room. Hong Kong for example...they don't even have enough space for their graves anymore.

As it is, we don't have enough land to use as agriculture.

In June, 2008, the Phoenix Lander returned data showing Martian soil to be slightly alkaline and containing vital nutrients such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and chloride, all of which are necessary for living organisms to grow. Scientists compared the soil near Mars's north pole to that of backyard gardens on Earth, and concluded that it could be suitable for growth of plants such as asparagus.
Somers
offline
Somers
1,532 posts
Nomad

No one really knows, since no human technology has ever approached or landed on an extrasolar planet. Minerals of some sort?


i would expect some sort of rock.

I learned in some science class that they actually tested people living in an enclosed space, such as people whom would be living in a moon-space colony bubble. anyways they put a # of people underground (Similar to how space would be) And the test failed. They went crazed, and out of control. So, the space population would have to be well tested with these sort of things....
nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

(Similar to how space would be) And the test failed. They went crazed, and out of control. So, the space population would have to be well tested with these sort of things....


That was the Russian test. Not implying anything bad...but...since then many tests have succeeded.
knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

i would expect some sort of rock.


Yeah, Minerals. Rocks and that stuff.


So, the space population would have to be well tested with these sort of things....


Of course they would. All who go into outer space need training and preparation for the new environment.

I watched a documentary on long term space travel. It showed how possible astronauts en route to Mars or some distant location would act in their environment. Said something about a AI (not Al) mediator in case of conflict.
Showing 1-15 of 25