ForumsGameswarfare 2067-idea

9 2121
anuekr
offline
anuekr
1 posts
Nomad

I REALLY like warfare and I think that a version of the game in the future will be very cool, you could also add the following:

* fuel bomb-a bomb which destroys a tank when shot at.
* more units behind an obstacle
* perhaps the ability to build bunkers (1 on each track) but they have to be manned manually.
* ability to customize troops this trooper has this weapon, this squad has these grenades, these troopers has their uniform etc.

  • 9 Replies
firetail_madness
offline
firetail_madness
20,540 posts
Blacksmith

Why 2067?

Buttersnack
offline
Buttersnack
332 posts
Peasant

I think the next in the series should be Vietnam. That would be cool.

seanclair97
offline
seanclair97
35 posts
Nomad

instead of jumping from 1944 to 2067 make the wars in between ther first.then you should make future wars.you should make past before future.

firetail_madness
offline
firetail_madness
20,540 posts
Blacksmith

Korean War, Vietnam War, Cold War (Maybe not possible)

valkyrie1119
offline
valkyrie1119
1,720 posts
Nomad

No Cold War. There was no real fighting involved, just spying, espionage, and the possibility of the destruction of the US! But there was no real fighting, so no.

I think after the Vietnam War it should be the Iraq War I guess. Modern Warfare or something would be pretty cool, although I think we'd be getting kind of burned out on the series by then.

turmoil95
offline
turmoil95
24 posts
Nomad

[b]MODERN WARFARE ALL THE WAY ! AND VIETNAM

mki10
offline
mki10
251 posts
Nomad

no the iraq war thats not even a fucking war

Bronze
offline
Bronze
2,416 posts
Shepherd

^ mki, are you saying the war in Iraq isn't real?

I say Civil War because it fits the style of these warfare games better. What I mean by that is the more straight up fighting style of the war.

P0dunkk
offline
P0dunkk
3 posts
Nomad

i think that it had better stay in the past or present...

Showing 1-9 of 9