Call of Duty all the way. Call of Duty has better graphics, control schemes, music, acting, realism, replay value, and multiplayer. Medal of Honor is incredibly boring and every level seemed exactly alike. And yeah, I agree with MrNiceGuy. heh heh heh.......
Acttually, I would prefer Medal of Honor. It uses actualy health, you can't just avoid some bullets until the side of your screen isn't red anymore. The graphics are prety much the same. COD is overhyped and MOH is modest.
I really only like CoD4 because so few shooters focus on today's wars, everything else is in past like way far back(WWII),or made up as in sci fi(i still like sci fi shooters though). The game intruged me for what time it was based on, but i wish it had story(which most shooters lack heavily).
Warbuddy wrote: comon people how (not)smart can you be. CoD 2 and CoD 4 were game of the year.
so the awnser is CoD is the Best (only if it comes from invinity wars)(treach sukks)
Come on, you... Just because those two games have been Game of the Year, it doesn't have to mean that they're actually the best. Some people might like Medal of Honor more than Call of Duty, even though Call of Duty have been Game of the Year. It's up to individuals what they like the most, and the question that started this thread was aimed at individuals, not the statistics that've made them Game of the Year. I hope you got my point )
Anyways, I like the CoD series the most - and that's not based on that they were Game of the Year, but the fact that I just like the "style" much more than MoH.
