ForumsGamesCall of Duty 4-5 vs. halo 3

19 3156
striker1131
offline
striker1131
9 posts
Nomad

Ok this is a true clash of the titans of 2 great video games. Who will win the fight, Halo? Or will it be Call of Duty.
Post your opinion and why you chose each game.

  • 19 Replies
FloydTC
offline
FloydTC
2,906 posts
Nomad

I dont like either but Ill go with call of duty because I like the name better.

ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

Hm.... This is difficult...I say that CoD wins cuz of Nazi Zombies, but I think FireFight will beat it out when ODST comes out. And who knows? maybe Modern Warfare 2 will beat ODST, but Reach....that's uncharted ground there.

uber1
offline
uber1
226 posts
Nomad

I got to say CoD4 ftw!!!

HEADHUNTER58
offline
HEADHUNTER58
370 posts
Nomad

nazi zombies is amazing but i hate the multiplayer.
cod4 multiplayer is the best.
and halo is just shit

Crab65
offline
Crab65
327 posts
Nomad

I find them to be mostly the same. Give me a vote for both of them.

Nightfox44
offline
Nightfox44
192 posts
Nomad

i don't like halo 2 or 3 because halo 1 was just epic!

but my vote gos to CoD because its way more customizable..

undertkr666
offline
undertkr666
33 posts
Nomad

I say Halo because the multiplayer is the best and cod is the played out ww2 scenario.

chocolateeggos
offline
chocolateeggos
50 posts
Nomad

cod:mw is the best of the three second for the singleplayer is cod:waw and 3rd because of the 8 year olds is halo3 i quit that because all i ever heard on the mic was *high pitched voice* STUPID NOOB U NO WANT FACE ME I 50 GENERAL...

tomthesniper
offline
tomthesniper
309 posts
Nomad

CoD all the way. All you find in Halo 3 nowadays is mostly high pitched little kids who talk about how much CoD sucks because either they suck too much at it or no one lets them win. CoD is more realistic, and its guns include more tech than Halo's weapons(which consists of basic rifles with a few blasters and plasma weapons).

Ryoko
offline
Ryoko
3 posts
Nomad

Call of Duty 4, Multiplayer .. it rocks, no matter if PS3 or on PC/Laptop. Also because u don't beat it in a short time, getting higher ranks gettin always harder. And it don't ends with 55, u can replay it up to 10 times for an even better rank.

mastercief26
offline
mastercief26
97 posts
Nomad

definitely halo 3. there's more weapon types and there are more abilities like hijacking vehicles and dual wielding weapons. plus there are alien weapons like the energy sword(tight).

DAG
offline
DAG
1 posts
Nomad

Ok Call of duty is a little more realistic halo 3 its more about super man than normal person but that is what i love about super jump going crazy with invisibility or some shield.
I prefer call of duty 5 than 4 cause i like to kick some nazi asses
3. COD4
2. CODWAW
1. Halo 1,2,3 and odst xD ftw

dartman
offline
dartman
5 posts
Nomad

COD would win hands down. i need not say more

ellame
offline
ellame
49 posts
Nomad

Well, besides both being first person shooters, the games have nothing in common, so it's hard to compare them. People play the games for different reasons. Halo obviously isn't at all realistic. It's scifi fantasy where you're a super soldier who can jump 20 feet in the air get shot 1000 times without dying.
CoD is a more down-to-earth, realistic feel. Generally speaking, you shoot a guy in the head and he dies, and you don't have to worry about giant monkey monsters hitting you with hammers.

So, the better of the two completely depends what mood I'm in.
I will concede that CoD multiplayer is much less frustrating. Whoever decided that you should be able to hear people talking through your television if you don't have a headset plugged in is a moron.

OperationNilo
offline
OperationNilo
3,937 posts
Shepherd

Halo 3 is much better.
CoD is just very bloody.

Showing 1-15 of 19