AGS Steam Games

Forums → The Tavern → Is moon walking true or not?

43 6988
surfthenet
offline
surfthenet
703 posts
Nomad

It just a simple question.

Back to 1969 where US moonwalking in the moon and MJ moonwalking on earth.

The question is......

Do you think it's true or lie?

If it's true, I mean, with poor technology at that time 1970s. Why we don't go to the moon again now? Why we don't make a very convincing movie to the moon now?

I mean, today's technology is 1000 times faster better and stronger right?

I think I saw 3 shadows in moonwalking videos on youtube, I could be means:

a. 3 suns.
b. 3 lightbulbs.
c. 3 persons that forget to turn the other 2 lightbulbs, right?

So, what do you think about it? Thx..........

  • 43 Replies
surfthenet
offline
surfthenet
703 posts
Nomad

You see, there was this thing called the cold war, and in order to beat the Russians, we had to fake the moon landing...

agreed.... indeed

That's my riddle.... finally I found someone with head.

Klaushouse
offline
Klaushouse
2,770 posts
Nomad

You guys still don't get what I mean.

I don't care about NASA or US this or US that, or Mythbusters.

I want your opinion, use your own head, not internet not the media.

lol.

simple question.

Yes or no?


That's stupid. That's like saying I don't care what a mathematician says about 2+2=4, I want to know what you think, real or not?

It's been proven that it's not fake, time and time again. Now shut up.
surfthenet
offline
surfthenet
703 posts
Nomad

It's been proven that it's not fake, time and time again. Now shut up.


why u always end up with 'now, shut up'. Your friends shut u up recently?

so, how about the HOT question?

Why not making a ship to go the moon again? Today's technology is 1000 times better and cheaper right? If not, I consider too many stupid lives in US now and then lol
goumas13
offline
goumas13
4,749 posts
Grand Duke

The landing was real, if it was fake somebody would have said that it was fake. Only few can keep secrets for ever.

Zega
offline
Zega
6,917 posts
Peasant

If it's true, I mean, with poor technology at that time 1970s. Why we don't go to the moon again now? Why we don't make a very convincing movie to the moon now?


The Swedish astronaut Christer Fuglesang (I think that's how you spelled it..) just returned from his trip to the moon. ;P You need to pay a little more attention before making a topic about this.

And of course Moonwalking is real!... Dude. :P
Strop
offline
Strop
10,816 posts
Bard

why u always end up with 'now, shut up'. Your friends shut u up recently?


Yes, I do it all the time.

Klaushouse, shut up with the shut ups, mkay? >
gamerme
offline
gamerme
484 posts
Nomad

i think i was a fake
i think that if they really went there properly there would be a space station and probely nucular warheads

JJ52
offline
JJ52
1,150 posts
Nomad

Why not making a ship to go the moon again? Today's technology is 1000 times better and cheaper right? If not, I consider too many stupid lives in US now and then lol


Your right its not like the USA is in a recession right now, already in billions of dollars of debt, and has no reason to go to the moon...

(BTW, that was sarcasm for those of you who havent figured that out...)
Klaushouse
offline
Klaushouse
2,770 posts
Nomad

Today's technology is 1000 times better and cheaper right? If not, I consider too many stupid lives in US now and then lol


Do you understand a word anyone is saying? It's not 1000 times cheaper, technology is better, but technology is way more expensive and NASA can't afford it.

Yes, I do it all the time.

Klaushouse, shut up with the shut ups, mkay? >

You are the only person on AG that could pull off telling me to shut up without me ringing their neck. Probably cause I still feel bad for ruining your panties.
Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

Why not making a ship to go the moon again? Today's technology is 1000 times better and cheaper right?


NASA was planning another moon mission within the next decade, however due to financial troubles and may not be able to do it.
OperationNilo
offline
OperationNilo
3,937 posts
Shepherd

I think they really got there,
and yeah, the HUGE amount
of money it costs to do
these operations.

Bug_Virus_Of_Olympus
offline
Bug_Virus_Of_Olympus
998 posts
Nomad

The moon is actually quite pointless other than looking pretty, but I believe it happened, it would actually be a tough thing for the men to suddenly show up in the atlantic ocean in a large craft without anyone noticing if they didn't break the atmosphere.

And going back is pointless and a waste of resources

Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

And going back is pointless and a waste of resources


If humans are ever going to advance past Earth, the moon is our first step for colonization. It's not as pointless as it is a waste resources right now.
goumas13
offline
goumas13
4,749 posts
Grand Duke

The moon is very important for the earth, but we don't have anything else to learn by going there, so we will probably not go there again soon.

Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

I mean, today's technology is 1000 times faster better and stronger right?


It isn't, but I'll play along.

We don't go back because there's nothing there we really care about at the moment. Pretty simple. If you researched this you would know NASA's timeline has us colonizing the moon in...can't remember the year -P And visiting mars in 2050. Or is it visiting mars then colonizing the moon in 2050?....darn...

And all those dumb things you read on the internet that prove we didn't land on the moon are false. The flag is waving because the guy's putting it in the ground, he's exerting force on it. The moon gets hit by light from the sun so it should have shadows =P The appearance that some shadows are facing different directions is merely an optical illusion.

Mythbusters kick ***


Darn rights
Showing 16-30 of 43