Forums → Games → COD WORLD at WAR VS HALO!

Nazi Zombies aren't the only good thing. Online is good too.

To compare totally different genres of games, is like comparing Ketchup to Mustard.

For starters while both games are FPS (First Person Shooters), they are in no way what so ever in the same category.

Halo is a First Person set in a futuristic world. While Call of Duty: World at War is set World War II.

Big Difference.

THANK YOU RttaM. Finally someone who notices that!

For the topic's sake... *rolls eyes*

I'd rather play Halo 3 over World at War. Mostly because Halo 3 is THE first FPS I have played, and with custom games it's really fun. ODST isn't that great. Campaign was pretty short in my opinion.

I never played halo 3 really... but im in love with WAW and im not even sure ill play MW2 because im so in love with WaW :P its not for nazi zombies either

Love the new Cod game AWESOME!

Modern Warfare 2 beats them all.

CoD World at War is good.
Cod Modern Warfare 2 is the best shooting game known to man, period.

World at War has really great graphics, storyline, and controls. Nazi Zombies is revolutionary for Call of Duty.

Modern Warfare has the new "choose your killstreak" feature. The multiplayer has really good game play. I dont care much for the 3rd person gamemodes or the "ricochet" game mode. Riot shield is good. Akimbo (a weapon in each hand) is useful in some cases. Graphics were even better than the last game. Controls and storyline was better as well.

Call of Duty is, by far, better that the Halo series. Especially since Call of Duty has a REAL LIFE game.

i love both of them to much to choose one over the other

world at war blows, bad aiming, tactics, guns, and in general a poorly thought game. Halo however relies on tactics.

What about modern warfare 2!?

I'm not going to judge which is better.
Same. Both good games....

COD world at war was just dissapointing! apart from zombies, the whole game kinda sucked...
so i'd say halo

Cod WIns because halo is highly overrated game in fact!