ForumsWEPRKill The Weak!

39 7830
Owen135731
offline
Owen135731
2,128 posts
Peasant

Social Darwinism. Discuss


*Is in a rush so the OP totally sucks*

  • 39 Replies
Riou1231
offline
Riou1231
4,825 posts
Peasant

Also, children are weak so why don't we kill them?


If we do kill them nobody will be left to carry on our heritage when we die.

I'm all against killing the weak, The human race works better when we stay together.
valkyrie1119
offline
valkyrie1119
1,720 posts
Nomad

What do we gain from killing the weak?

Sometimes I wonder if Hitler is still alive, influencing users on this site...

Owen135731
offline
Owen135731
2,128 posts
Peasant

What do we gain from killing the weak?

Sometimes I wonder if Hitler is still alive, influencing users on this site...


I just made the topic; doesn't mean I believe in it.
caucasiafro
offline
caucasiafro
338 posts
Nomad

Yeah! Lets kill some babies!!

Im I on the wrong side? :P

Dissolution
offline
Dissolution
22 posts
Nomad

I just made the topic; doesn't mean I believe in it.


I know. But other people actually think its a good idea.
VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

No, don't kill the young. They'll get older, we have no idea how usful they will be unless they are physically or mentally retarded.

Kill the old people. The people that have outlived their utility in the community.

balerion07
offline
balerion07
2,837 posts
Peasant

This reminds me of the race from Babylon 5 that viewed all others as lesser lifeforms and when they saw the separation of the haves and have nots they decided to integrate it into their own society.

TotalReview
offline
TotalReview
803 posts
Shepherd

How do you determine what is weak? We have no clue what the future holds for us, so it is a terrible idea to just kill people because of what you think is weak.

rafterman
offline
rafterman
600 posts
Nomad

What do we gain from killing the weak?

A stronger population.

Also, children are weak so why don't we kill them?

Because they will grow up and possibly become stronger.

Sounds horrible dosn't it. Darwanism is the back bone of abortions. Killing babys, which are the weakset. It is the same as killing an old lady in front of you at walmart, becuse she took to long to find $8.50 in her purse which she dropped 5 times.

Darwinism is not the back bone of abortion and your analogy is false.

If we do kill them nobody will be left to carry on our heritage when we die.

No one except the strong.

How do you determine what is weak?

You determine what is weak by what is easily susceptible to viruses.
Hectichermit
offline
Hectichermit
1,828 posts
Bard

Well with genetics they can predict your chances of acquiring a disease but in the end they cannot be 100% certain. Solution to this is simple if your dead your weak if your alive you not. Then again we will all die, also why not say if I have a deadly non commutable disease I could just get a gun and shoot someone whose in perfect health and say I'm stronger then you. If you think you are so strong and post an argument about strength go and think for a second. YOU ARE WEAK! It just takes a simple thing like a 5mm piece of lead to remove such ideas about strength. and lets not forget that many of these old people control politics and are in charge of many powerful entities. A bullet is nothing compared to a army or a police force, just try and go around and pass your judgement upon others, kill them then you will become a target and all targets are weak.

TheDude42
offline
TheDude42
1,026 posts
Nomad

Rafterman, we aren't animals. We care for each other and are nice, that (and not intelligence) is what separates us from animals. God (of course it depends on your religion) wants us to be nice to others, because that shows that we are truly strong.

tomertheking
offline
tomertheking
1,751 posts
Jester

A stronger population.


that is used to killing.

We care for each other and are nice


Proportionaly, yes.

It just takes a simple thing like a 5mm piece of lead to remove such ideas about strength.


yes.

You determine what is weak by what is easily susceptible to viruses.


And if a person that is susceptitible to viruses is an extrordionary inventor?

How do you determine what is weak? We have no clue what the future holds for us, so it is a terrible idea to just kill people because of what you think is weak.


Yes.
Dissolution
offline
Dissolution
22 posts
Nomad

You determine what is weak by what is easily susceptible to viruses.


??? There are gaping holes in that. They're so obvious I refuse to point them out.

If you really had to rat out the weak from the strong, here's what you look for.

Strong Traits

Intelligence

Ability to do good work

Physical strength/Athleticism

People with power over others
TheDude42
offline
TheDude42
1,026 posts
Nomad

They're so obvious I refuse to point them out.

...Or you don't know the holes in that.
zombieslayer
offline
zombieslayer
94 posts
Nomad

[quote]Strong Traits

Intelligence

See dissolution has presented something that has been very neglected especially with talk of killing old people. they are wise. intelligence is the most important strength here in the 21st century.

Showing 16-30 of 39