ForumsWEPRCuba's Socialist Gains

62 14627
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

http://www.cubatruth.info/index.html

The site shows statistics relevant to standards of living in Cuba. It compares them to other Latin American nations. It also lists facts detailing the Cuban economic and financial sector.

Very interesting what immense Cuba has managed to gain on its tiny island.

Some excerpts:

Persons per Doctor
____

Cuba - 169
United States - 421
Brazil - 844
Dominican Republic - 949
Haiti - 10,005

Unemployment
_____
Cuba - 1.9%
Bolivia - 8%
United States - 9.5%
Argentina - 15.6%
Haiti - 70%

Inflation
___
Cuba - 0.30%
US - 3.20%
Argentina - 9.6%

Women in Government
____
Cuba - 36%
Argentina - 31%
US - 14%

Facts
___
* The average Cuban worker has ten years of education; one of every ten scientists in Latin America and the Caribbean is in Cuba (although Cuba makes up only 2% of the region's population).

* The UN recently announced that Cuba is the only country in Latin America that has no malnutrition.


* Gas bills in Cuba average 2-4 pesos (8-16 cents) a month; electricity 5-7 pesos (20-28 cents) a month; telephone 6-8 pesos (24-32 cents) a month, the first 300 minutes being free. As you can see, all these services are subsidized by the State.

  • 62 Replies
celerylipstick
offline
celerylipstick
51 posts
Nomad

"statistics shows us that the living standards in Cuba are relatively high compared to other nations in Latin America"

its pro-communist living standards are many times lower compared with its pre-castro living standards of the 1950's. this is due to the failures of fidel, not to the american embargo. do you even know how the embargo got started? fidel's idiocy is what started it.

after america won the war against spain they granted cuba the right to gain her independence. with this american influence, cuba developed a pro-capitalist economy and for about 50 years havana was booming. fidel saw that the wealth was not being distributed SO HE REFUSED TO DO BUSINESS WITH AMERICA! he kicked out every american citizen, taking over their homes and corporations. in response, america initiated its trade embargo.

well, it's been about 50 years, fidel has had AMPLE OPPORTUNITY to develop an economically independent cuba. but he failed! rather than finding ways to achieve economic independence, fidel turned cuba into a giant welfare recipient, milking like a baby off the soviet empire. what happened when communism crashed? in 1990, SOVIET SUBSIDIES TO CUBA WORTH FIVE BILLION/YR WERE HALTED.

let me say that again. in 1990, SOVIET SUBSIDIES TO CUBA WORTH FIVE BILLION/YR WERE HALTED. fidel's economy had no legs to stand on. america saw this suffering and opened the embargo allowing medicine and food to be traded, now AMERICA IS NOW CUBA'S 5th LARGEST TRADING PARTNER. so all that suffering wasn't caused by the embargo at all, it was caused by fidel! therefore,

"it's a weak excuse for cuba to blame another country for its failures."

balerion07
offline
balerion07
2,837 posts
Peasant

This is funny I thought I lost what I had written when it didn't post but I found it was still there.

Drace, again the absurdity of your statements makes me laugh. Cubans have more doctors because they are stuck in their country and cannot go anywhere else as they normally would. More people are employed because the government is made to be so sprawling that everyone has a cousin that works for them. Cuba cannot compete with anyone the way things are. The instant Cubans are allowed to leave the country I foresee a mass exodus.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

its pro-communist living standards are many times lower compared with its pre-castro living standards of the 1950's. this is due to the failures of fidel, not to the american embargo. do you even know how the embargo got started? fidel's idiocy is what started it.


WTF are you saying? Havana was heaven before the revolution???
Literacy was 54%, life expectancy 55, and the infant mortality rate was 60/1000.

after america won the war against spain they granted cuba the right to gain her independence. with this american influence, cuba developed a pro-capitalist economy and for about 50 years havana was booming. fidel saw that the wealth was not being distributed SO HE REFUSED TO DO BUSINESS WITH AMERICA! he kicked out every american citizen, taking over their homes and corporations. in response, america initiated its trade embargo.


Business was booming for whom? The capitalists who exploited the resources?
Of course he kicked out the corporations. That was the whole point of the revolution.

The official reason given for the embargo is "democratization and greater respect for human rights". But the embargo is completely useless in this and is rather hurting Cuba's economy.

well, it's been about 50 years, fidel has had AMPLE OPPORTUNITY to develop an economically independent cuba. but he failed! rather than finding ways to achieve economic independence, fidel turned cuba into a giant welfare recipient, milking like a baby off the soviet empire. what happened when communism crashed? in 1990, SOVIET SUBSIDIES TO CUBA WORTH FIVE BILLION/YR WERE HALTED.


Cuba is a island with 12 million people, I don't know what you mean by economically independent.

let me say that again. in 1990, SOVIET SUBSIDIES TO CUBA WORTH FIVE BILLION/YR WERE HALTED. fidel's economy had no legs to stand on. america saw this suffering and opened the embargo allowing medicine and food to be traded, now AMERICA IS NOW CUBA'S 5th LARGEST TRADING PARTNER. so all that suffering wasn't caused by the embargo at all, it was caused by fidel! therefore,


The conditions in Cuba did improve. And the embargo has had devastating effects of 36 thousand 221 million dollars losses to Cuba.
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Might I add that the embargo has been condemned multiple times by the UN and many countries.

Drace, again the absurdity of your statements makes me laugh.


I don't give a f. Grow up

Cubans have more doctors because they are stuck in their country and cannot go anywhere else as they normally would.


Makes no sense. Even if everyone had a paid vacation and 5 million people went out of the country. The rate of doctors would still be 1 in 169. I don't see the relation of being stuck in a country and having a high amount of doctors.

More people are employed because the government is made to be so sprawling that everyone has a cousin that works for them.


What's that suppose to mean?

Cuba cannot compete with anyone the way things are.


Why not? That's what the statistics are for and they show Cuba's standards rather high.

The instant Cubans are allowed to leave the country I foresee a mass exodus.


They were allowed to leave earlier under the Cuban Adjustment Act. Only a few percentage of the population did so. The masses that came were criminals and so Carter undid it.
balerion07
offline
balerion07
2,837 posts
Peasant

Makes no sense. Even if everyone had a paid vacation and 5 million people went out of the country. The rate of doctors would still be 1 in 169. I don't see the relation of being stuck in a country and having a high amount of doctors


Vacation... wow. Statistics show that large numbers of doctors that become professionals travel to the... yep you guessed it, United States so they can get rich. It is often reffered to as the brain drain and provides a better life for those with Masters and Doctorates (yes I know you meant MDs but it is much wider spread). They come here and the country of their origin loses brillaint minds.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Vacation... wow. Statistics show that large numbers of doctors that become professionals travel to the... yep you guessed it, United States so they can get rich. It is often reffered to as the brain drain and provides a better life for those with Masters and Doctorates (yes I know you meant MDs but it is much wider spread). They come here and the country of their origin loses brillaint minds.


Though that is obviously not true for Cuba.
celerylipstick
offline
celerylipstick
51 posts
Nomad

the point of the revolution was to ban american wealth from cuba? then by blaming a lack of american wealth on cuba's miseries, he suggests that the revolution was a mistake. what a complete moron!

america was like a fast food restaurant and cubans loved american fries. fidel was like a customer that blamed his obesity on the fries instead of himself. so he kicked them out of cuba. in retaliation, the american fast food company refused to take any more orders from fidel. his solution was to order pizza from the soviet restaurant. when the soviet restaurant closed, he complained that the american fast food company was the cause of his hunger all along. but we know it wasn't. fidel's fault was that he never learned how to cook for himself.

to help explain the analogy. the new cuban communists were so concerned about distributing the wealth, that they ignored methods of its accumulation. fidel failed cuba by not creating industries that could sustain it in times of economic crisis. instead, he looked for handouts from the soviet mother. when she stopped her subsidies, cuba hit a recession and fidel blamed the americans instead of himself.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Vacation... wow. Statistics show that large numbers of doctors that become professionals travel to the... yep you guessed it, United States so they can get rich. It is often reffered to as the brain drain and provides a better life for those with Masters and Doctorates (yes I know you meant MDs but it is much wider spread). They come here and the country of their origin loses brillaint minds.


So? If doctors are leaving Cuba than it should have even a lower number of doctors. But yet, it has one in 169, while the US (where supposedly all the doctors go to) has 1 in ~450)

the point of the revolution was to ban american wealth from cuba? then by blaming a lack of american wealth on cuba's miseries, he suggests that the revolution was a mistake. what a complete moron!


It was to overthrow the US backed Batista dictatorship and private ownership.

to help explain the analogy. the new cuban communists were so concerned about distributing the wealth, that they ignored methods of its accumulation. fidel failed cuba by not creating industries that could sustain it in times of economic crisis. instead, he looked for handouts from the soviet mother. when she stopped her subsidies, cuba hit a recession and fidel blamed the americans instead of himself.


How did Castro fail Cuba? The whole point of the statistics was to show that Cuba is quite successful.
And the embargo, no doubt causes the Cuban economy harm.

I don't care if Fidel Castro blames it on the Americans or not.
celerylipstick
offline
celerylipstick
51 posts
Nomad

there were many ways that cuba could have sprung forward with a strong economic system independent of american influence. it just failed to figure out how to do it. however, it does export doctors in return for oil.

cuba has about 65 to 70,000 doctors and roughly 25 to 30,000 are exported to other countries. so the figure for persons per doctor is a lie. it's about 271 people per cuban-resident doctor whereas america's stats is about 244 persons per primary care providers as of 2005.

cuban healthcare in general is atrocious. only the wealthy and members of the communist party have all their needs met. sure, everyone gets basic needs met. however, for advanced medicines, surgeries, and treatments, cuban citizens are expected to pay under the table. there are about 12 percent communist party members within the total cuban population so this leaves a great deal of the population without the means to adequate health care.

unemployment. since the economic crash, people who worked in the cities were moved to the fields. these were entrepreneurs asked to raise potatoes for the common good. they were dirt poor, literally. cuba has food rations. you only get so much, and everything beyond that is a crime. nevertheless, the entrepreneurs from the cities took the chance on selling extra potato from the fields anyway. they soon made more money on this newly created black market than they could by registering for work through the government. so many people were doing this that fidel's solution was to legalize the black market. now instead of seeing an unemployed field laborer, you'll see a self-employed businessman. the name just changed, but the effect lowered the unemployment figures.

communist09
offline
communist09
259 posts
Nomad

the point of the revolution was to ban american wealth from cuba? then by blaming a lack of american wealth on cuba's miseries, he suggests that the revolution was a mistake. what a complete moron!


The purpose of the Revolution was to free Cuba of Batista and to free Cuba from the wrath of the corporations who exploited Cuba's resources and people. And you also mentioned earlier that Havana's economy was booming before the Revolution. The people weren't getting any richer, it was the social elite, which in this case being the American corporations.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

cuba has about 65 to 70,000 doctors and roughly 25 to 30,000 are exported to other countries. so the figure for persons per doctor is a lie. it's about 271 people per cuban-resident doctor whereas america's stats is about 244 persons per primary care providers as of 2005.


Until you cite a source, we're using Drace's info because he. uh, supported his claims.
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

there were many ways that cuba could have sprung forward with a strong economic system independent of american influence. it just failed to figure out how to do it. however, it does export doctors in return for oil.


Look at the link on the embargo. Cuba cannot purchase products from American corporations, which restricts it from much progress. Its not going to buy high tech equipment for hospitals from El Salvador. And you making the claim it is unable to survive and yet I given the statistics to show how much better Cuba is than many other capitalist nations.

And what? Cuba sends doctors off to other countries in return for oil?
How do you trade a person and his services for oil?

Oh you mean Venezuela is paying for it with their oil money. Much different.

Yes I did some reading on this. Cuba sends medical teams to provide disaster relief in more than 68 countries.
Though any source I look at tells me Cuba is the leading nations with most doctors per person.
"Remarkably, Cuba leads the world (or at least those countries shown on this map) in the patients per doctor ratio."


cuba has about 65 to 70,000 doctors and roughly 25 to 30,000 are exported to other countries. so the figure for persons per doctor is a lie. it's about 271 people per cuban-resident doctor whereas america's stats is about 244 persons per primary care providers as of 2005.


Source? And 12 million/70,000 equals one doctor per 171 people, which is very close to the statistic given.

cuban healthcare in general is atrocious. only the wealthy and members of the communist party have all their needs met. sure, everyone gets basic needs met. however, for advanced medicines, surgeries, and treatments, cuban citizens are expected to pay under the table. there are about 12 percent communist party members within the total cuban population so this leaves a great deal of the population without the means to adequate health care.


What BS. What kind of statistics, fact, or any evidence do you have for your claim?
Compare that to the 50 million Americans who get no health care at all.
And as if the rich don't enjoy better health care either.

Do some reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Cuba

Cuba's life expectancy is much higher, it has more doctors per person, more beds per person, more attended births, more access to sanitation, every person is covered (even if its limited, as you allege), and it has eliminated malnutrition.

Compare this to the other Latin American nations where your quite lucky to even put food on the table.
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Why not? Wikipedia lists its sources. I never seen any misinformation on it.

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Wikipedia in a debate is not a source Drace.


Well, it's not markedly less accurate than, say, Encyclopedia Bitannica.

Also, that article has in-text parenthetical citations for the statistics - if you read the article, you could've, you know, clicked them and verified it yourself if you're really so cynical as to waste your time like that.
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

There a lot of moderators on there that watch every change made.
I tried editing some stuff myself, its very hard to do so.

Showing 31-45 of 62