Given the theme of the previous discussion, how about a rotational roster? I know from experience that judging for more than twice in a row becomes steadily more chore-like... but after a while you do tend to miss it.
Downside to this is that it's hard to organise and requires everybody to be reliable. Which frankly, hardly anybody is.
Given the theme of the previous discussion, how about a rotational roster? I know from experience that judging for more than twice in a row becomes steadily more chore-like... but after a while you do tend to miss it.
Maybe.
For now, I'm passing the post onto Bronze unless anyone has serious objections other than "I would be a better judge/want to judge more than he does!"... Then a potential rotational roster can be discussed further, if needed. To prevent wearing him down, I suppose.