ForumsPopular MediaPercy Jackson: Movie vs Book

34 9509
valkery
offline
valkery
1,255 posts
Nomad

I have not seen the movie, but I really enjoyed all of the books. Hoefully some of you can help me decide whether or not I should see the movie.

  • 34 Replies
snipershot325
offline
snipershot325
844 posts
Nomad

The lightning theif the book is defenitly way better then the movie!THE books are always better than the movie,ok!But its still a good experience to watch the movie too right?

Saving123
offline
Saving123
1,258 posts
Nomad

But its still a good experience to watch the movie too right?

Wrong. That is completely my opinion though.
TRUdog
offline
TRUdog
1,031 posts
Nomad

The movie sucked my dogs buffalo balls... and thats putting things lightly.
It WAS NOT kid friendly even though it was SUPPOSED to be. They constantly said curse words, and it was a little freaky, even for me.
They DID NOT go with the story AT ALL!!!!!!! The acting was horrible, and the story line was a piece of crap.
The only good thing about the movie was the CGI, thats it.

Saving123
offline
Saving123
1,258 posts
Nomad

The acting was horrible

The actors were horriblr, and don't even get me started on Annabeth not being blonde!!!!
1337Player
offline
1337Player
1,766 posts
Peasant

They didn't put Clariese in it. (Or however you spell her name) And the characters didn't look like how Rick described them in the book. Er, I forgot what I was going to say next.

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

Grover in the movie was awesome. I love that dude. But if you compare it with the Grover in the books, they aren't alike. Annabeth is FRIGGIN BLONDE. And they had to make the kids older because who would really believe that a band of tweens can go across america and back again without being noticed?
They should of added the Ares part. Cause that sets up the NEXT book. And Riptide was not a click pen. it was a cap pen. and he got the sheild from Tyson, not Luke. I love the books, but if I wouldn't of read the books before the movie, I would of probably liked it better.

Saving123
offline
Saving123
1,258 posts
Nomad

And they had to make the kids older because who would really believe that a band of tweens can go across america and back again without being noticed?

They are half super natural being not just your avereage "tweens". And in the books they aren't "not noticed". Plus the mist, which plays a very omprtant role in the series with R.E.D. The red headed girl and all, oh how I hope they don't mess it up.
Grover in the movie was awesome. I love that dude. But if you compare it with the Grover in the books, they aren't alike. Annabeth is FRIGGIN BLONDE. And they had to make the kids older because who would really believe that a band of tweens can go across america and back again without being noticed?
They should of added the Ares part. Cause that sets up the NEXT book. And Riptide was not a click pen. it was a cap pen. and he got the sheild from Tyson, not Luke. I love the books, but if I wouldn't of read the books before the movie, I would of probably liked it better.

And you sound like my friend haha, she is completly obsessed with the series, and she noticed some things that I didn't. But most of these things I already knew.
Grassble
offline
Grassble
167 posts
Nomad

The actors were horriblr, and don't even get me started on Annabeth not being blonde!!!
And she didn't have grey Eyes either. The movie was completely wrong!
Saving123
offline
Saving123
1,258 posts
Nomad

And she didn't have grey Eyes either. The movie was completely wrong!

It was like hello your an actress, try hair dye, and contacts aaaaaaaaaHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
stan4life
offline
stan4life
95 posts
Nomad

haven't read the book movie wasn't that great...

Aaliyah928
offline
Aaliyah928
252 posts
Nomad

Stan, read the books. 700000000 times better. The movie follows NOTHING! Not even the main enemy that stole the bolt. Grar! It also messed up the plot twist, the underworld 1. And the ENTIRE PLOT! It was really disappointing. Grover and Percy were cool though, well casted those two were, and the centaur I forgot his name, but he's amazing.

Crouchbite
offline
Crouchbite
219 posts
Nomad

The books were better. The movie was very inaccurate and totally butchered the whole series.

Drink
offline
Drink
1,621 posts
Blacksmith

theres a book?

CommanderDude7
offline
CommanderDude7
4,689 posts
Nomad

Books always trump the movies that are made later.

Zega
offline
Zega
6,921 posts
Peasant

I posted a similar thread once and reviewed it, so I'm not going to go into detail now.

The books = AMAZING!!!
The movie = I'd rather grow up to be a doctor specializing in heart transplantation. And I have a huuuuuge blood-phobia. Yeah, it really sucked.
The movie is an insult to the books, and I really hate it. Just like what they did with Eragon. The acting was horrible in the movie, they either over-reacted or under-reacted to EVERYTHING. I CAN DO BETTER! And I'm horrid at acting! UGH!....

TL;DR Version:
Book>Movie

Showing 16-30 of 34