ForumsWEPRTobacco

34 5236
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

Should tobacco companies be held responsible for the effects of smoking?

  • 34 Replies
Moe
offline
Moe
1,714 posts
Blacksmith

I like this, but you CAN however blame the tobbacco companies for saying tobbacco is good for you, and for advertising, spending billions on what could be used to help create a better world.


You can also blame them for all the poisons added to tobacco in their cigarettes.
adios194
offline
adios194
818 posts
Nomad

Even quicksilver is natural.
Try drinking a little bit!

Drink some mercury and jade powder together, it's the cool thing in china.
but you CAN however blame the tobbacco companies for saying tobbacco is good for you, and for advertising, spending billions on what could be used to help create a better world.

They don't say it's good for you. They say on the pack that it's bad for you.
You can also blame them for all the poisons added to tobacco in their cigarettes.

You smoke them, they don't make you.
whyismynametom
offline
whyismynametom
263 posts
Nomad

Tobacco in the old days Blame is needed but now days people know what they are doing and it is ok, i think that it is morally wrong to do it but hey its their call, they saw it could kill you now of days i put blame on smokers.

IISn1p3dII
offline
IISn1p3dII
21 posts
Nomad

It's the person's decision to smoke, and with the media these days its very clear smoking is extremely unhealthy and a big "NO-NO". When they light a cigarette and suck in the smoke, they realize what's happening. Tobacco companies only have to do with advertisement and merchandising, etc.

Showing 31-34 of 34