We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More
Forums → The Tavern → Universe(s), opposite of dark holes
| 9 | 2553 |
Yup another theory.
If black holes happen when a star with enough mass implode, what happens when it explode?
My theory says that when they explode, they create an universe inside them. sounds crazy but keep reading:
If dark holes suck mass, universes do the opposite: They keep growing, but they grow in a way that they do not affect the space surrounding them, they make things inside them smaller,so the universe look big and universes have a gravity(outside them) that prevents stuff from colliding with the universe(gravity doesn't pulls, it does the opposide). And on the space-time thing universes are like mountains and that nothing is atracted to them. And there may be a lot of universes inside our galaxy, and there may be more universes indside those universes in our galaxy. But there are some stars that explode "outside the universes" because there isn't only one universe with lots of universes inside it, but there are more, and when the star explodes "outside" another universe is created. And black holes may be the passage way to "outside" or to other universes.
I know you may be wanting to shout bad things in this topic cos you didn't understand anything, BUT i had some kind of headache after I thought about this theory so I cant remenber very well. But I remenber a picture that was like a lot of glass balls(universes) with some galaxies inside them and the balls seemed to be orbitying the center. that is where i got my theory from. I will update the theory after a few suggestions from you so that it makes more sense.
- 9 Replies
When a star explodes a great deal of its matter is shot off into the universe and goes wherever, possibly to another star or maybe even too us. What is left of the star becomes a white dwarf I believe, but they don't create their own little universes, they just recycle matter into the old universe.
If black holes happen when a star with enough mass implode, what happens when it explode?
Actually, they don't implode. There is actually a critical mass limit that a star can have before it collapses under its own gravity to form a black hole. It's called the Chandrasekhar Limit.
Any star that exceeds 1.4 solar masses, collapses under the intense effect of its own gravity to bend the space-time fabric, which we have now come to call a black hole.
However, as Kirby pointed out, some stars become extremely huge and form Super-Red Giants after all hydrogen is exhausted and degenerate to form White-dwarfs or Black dwarfs.
Just to add to it, Black Holes don't only suck everything, they spew out gamma rays due to which they can be seen as extremely "bright" solar objects in the night sky (if I'm not mistaken, these objects are called Pulsars).
Sorry for the double post. I meant to say neutron stars instead of Black Holes, in the last paragraph of my previous post. Neutron stars have intense gravitational fields as well and spin extremely fast. (These are also called pulsars).
Interesting theory, to bad you did not take into consideration White Holes. They are basically the opposite of blacke holes and scientist think that all matter drawn into a black hole eventually comes out a white hole.
think of a black hole like a bowling ball on a trampalene.
if you put somthing big and round that wieghs alot on a trampolene it sinks into the tramp. now think oof that same ball keeping its same weight and mass only getting smaller. the tramp would sink even more and more. thats how black holes work
If black holes happen when a star with enough mass implode, what happens when it explode?
An explosion, that's it. Lots of debris, but not the opposite of a black hole.
I believe you are thinking of White Hole, which is a very confusing theoretical object. like Stephen Hawkings thinks:
Since a thermal equilibrium state is time reversal invariant, Stephen Hawking argued that the time reverse of a black hole in thermal equilibrium is again a black hole in thermal equilibrium.[2] This implies that black holes and white holes are the same object. The Hawking radiation from an ordinary black hole is then identified with the white hole emission.
Pulsars and quasars are about the same thing right?
A pulsar is a neutron that is rapidly spinning, and blinks on and off. Quasars are extremely far objects that move at 99.9% the speed of light and have an immense of amount of energy. They are believed to be galaxies with black holes in them, a sort of galaxy stage.
it is so strange that i always learn something in my theories...
it is stranger that some1 always give me a link to a site with a theory similar to mine and i had no idea that the theory already existed
You just made my gravity well cry.
I'm not a physicist, and don't really plan on it, but my own little theory says that when matter gets sucked into a black hole, it stays there. Forever.
It literally keeps it with itself.
Black holes to me are just giant focal points of mass. Similar to the singularity that made the big bang, but only with mass compressed to a much less scale, rather than all the things in the universe in the form of energy and all the antimatter before it got destroyed.
Anyways, black hole I think are just enormous hunks of mass, compressed. Really compressed. Like a super giant blue star compressed to around a mile in diameter or so.
Black holes are points where the escape velocity is greater than 3 x 10^8. Therefore nothing, not even light, can escape its gravitational pull, cause the "black" hole. However, not much work has been done in this field since physicists have yet to combine the theories of nuclear forces and electromagnetism with those of gravity. However, claiming that mass is created, which is not possible, when a star explodes is ridiculous. In my opinion you just should have started this with "Once upon a time..." and posted it in the AMW section.
You must be logged in to post a reply!
Showing 1-9 of 9