ForumsWEPRThe beginning...

20 3450
kirby1243
offline
kirby1243
141 posts
Nomad

So one day, I was watching T.V (Discovery or History, I.D.K I fogot) and what he said was that according to the data of the human race, and the length of how long we have been here for, it is IMPOSSIABLE for us to have advanced at the time that we have been here. So according to these historians and physicists, evolution is a theory, not a myth. Comments?

  • 20 Replies
kingryan
offline
kingryan
4,196 posts
Farmer

It's not true. Those scientists you cited must be in the vast minority of those who are still dogmatically clinging onto a 2000 year old myth which has been disproven on every point.


No it hasn't...there are still many things which haven't been disproven. Such as the evidence that Christ did rise from the dead and such (I give it not long before I have to justify this...).
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

So according to these historians and physicists, evolution is a theory, not a myth. Comments?


Just wondering but were any of them actually biologists? You know, the people who would actually us evolution in their every day practice. I mean saying a historian claims evolution is false is like getting a medical opinion about why your head hurts from a foot doctor.
kirby1243
offline
kirby1243
141 posts
Nomad

I mean saying a historian claims evolution is false is like getting a medical opinion about why your head hurts from a foot doctor.

These people didn't just state "Hey guys, i'm a smart guy and I say that evolution is a myth and I can say this because we just think so." That's not it. What they did is they broken down, did research, and studied the fact that for abes to evolve into a human being would be too long, yes they are saying that 3.5 billion years is too long. Evolution doesn't just just make an ape go -BOOM- "I'M A HUMAN " no, it's much more complacated and takes billions of years.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

What they did is they broken down, did research, and studied the fact that for abes to evolve into a human being would be too long, yes they are saying that 3.5 billion years is too long.


3.5 billion is going from single celled life to what we have today. So what they were doing is just focusing on human evolution? I'm guessing you mean to short of a time rather then to long. If you really do mean to long then your making no sense what so ever.
kirby1243
offline
kirby1243
141 posts
Nomad

Lol, woops. Yeah you're right, I do mean too short.

Showing 16-20 of 20