Well I have another rank suggestion. Maybe if you could add Emperor after king? And instead of having just wood, silver, then gold, maybe you could add in 2 so it would be like this: Wood, Silver, Gold, Platoon, Diamond.
To sum it up, could you perhaps add: Emperor Platoon and Diamond.
What names do you have in mind? Gold Serf isn't fitting too.
I can imagine a Serf nicking some gold from his master. But getting Platinum from a mine that hasn't even opened in the Middle Ages?
And serf with diamonds from Africa? Lol...
Perhaps putting ranks in between the old ones? How about silver (Because we now have Iron, which many forget) and bronze?
we need dozens more Kings/Queens first.
Which will be a long time... seeing as this site has been around for over two years (AG 2.0) and we've only recently 48 kings/queens. So we can sit back and relax until this idea is ever implemented...
Which will be a long time... seeing as this site has been around for over two years (AG 2.0) and we've only recently 48 kings/queens. So we can sit back and relax until this idea is ever implemented...
^
Barely anyone on Ag is over the king/queen rank. I think the rank system is just fine.
This isn't really needed maybe when we have over 2-3 hundred kings and queens may this be implemented.
-----
But on the Idea of more ranks, I don't think we need more serfs or knights or anything like that here, is my Idea.
When someone reaches Gold King/Queen, they should go up by levels, Like Gold King level 1,2,3,4,5, and so on. As seeing the ranks system probably follows a pattern, just implement this pattern into the levels for endless ranking up, so people will be quiet about there not being enough ranks.
But getting Platinum from a mine that hasn't even opened in the Middle Ages?
Good point.
When someone reaches Gold King/Queen, they should go up by levels, Like Gold King level 1,2,3,4,5, and so on. As seeing the ranks system probably follows a pattern, just implement this pattern into the levels for endless ranking up, so people will be quiet about there not being enough ranks.
I agree. Though instead of 1,2,3,4,5 it should be I,II,III,IV,V. Looks better in my opinion.
this is a good idea, but it might upset people that worked hard to get to a rank such as prince of king, then they would have to be demoted to duke? or would the amount of points needed for diamond and platinum be between the amount of points needed for gold and bronze?
I believe that one shouldn't care about going down in rank. Everyone goes down too, and we'll all make up for the losses eventually, while we have fun.
Good idea! We can show the young ones the first five numbers of the Roman number system.
I'd say that the ranks we have at the moment are fine. I'm working hard enough to get gold serf...
That only applies to some of the users: Some people make over 100 AP per day, due to rating/commenting/loads of foruming, and they really shoot through the ranks.
it'll be in AG V.3
that doesn't mean we can't give our ideas on this. If we suggest it now, it probably has a higher chance of being implemented in AG 3.0.
