Who outside the current 100 would you put in an all-time AG top one hundred, in the case of activity? Honestly all I can think of at the moment is Alt and Owen.
lemme ask you this nurvana. why did you make this thread? what was the purpose? Im not saying you are deliberately spamming or such. I just want to know what the point of this thread? I mean it's great you think some people deserve to be in the top 100 and all
but obviously they arent for some reasons like they are extrmeley active in the forum games section, or maybe they dont bother rating games for AP or resorting to comment boosting conversation, I mean there are OBvious reasons to such why some people are and why some people arent in the top 100
I can see why you would say that, as possibly someone in the 80's could have made their way there by rating all the games/ using only comments with 0 merits and minimal forum posts.
Im just trying to make you think, because recently there have been an influx of threads that basically consist of regurgitation. resulting in people posting with minimal thought and thus contributing very little to the forums.
If they are active, they will get there. But who cares about a ranking, when you can have good reputations among the other active users by being awesome amongst them?
I see no real purpose of this thread, and it can end up badly by singling out users for better or worse. After all, if someone is put on the top 100, someone has to be taken off.
