ForumsSupport Forumconartists - warfare 1917-44

8 2479
foyboy123123123
offline
foyboy123123123
1 posts
Nomad

conartists,

i think it would be a good idea to make warfare 2010
in afganistan

OR

a multiplayer warfare

plz commet and tell me what you think[b]

  • 8 Replies
kacboy
offline
kacboy
1,846 posts
Nomad

i think it would be a good idea to make warfare 2010
in afganistan

Me two but nope. If I remember clearly, on the ConArtist Games forums Con said he wanted to do something more hand to hand combat with Warfare. A modern may come eventually though.

a multiplayer warfare

Nope. Con said specifically in one of his blog posts for The Last Stand 3. Which probably applies for all of his new games.
Multiplayer / Co-op?
No, no no, no. No. No?
2014631
offline
2014631
1,855 posts
Nomad

i think it would be a good idea to make warfare 2010
in afganistan



But then it would be skipping many of the other wars, such as Vietnam.
gamemakermaster
offline
gamemakermaster
83 posts
Nomad

Yeah it will be great terrorists Vs soldier's but it will be no fun if there is only wars in afganistan, pakistan is full of terrorist's. hahaha lol

knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

@2014631

You don't need to do everything in chronological order.

This might be a good idea. Might. I'm not so sure about terrorists though. As kacboy said, Con wants to travel to a different time period. More hand-to-hand combat.

I hope something ancient is done. I love ancient warfare.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

I played Warfare 1944, and I didn't like it. I liked Warfare 1917 more because of the trench positions. I played it for a while. People would be disinterested in another Warfare game. It's like Final Destination. First one was good, second one was bad, let's not ruin the franchise even more and make a third one. They decided to make another one, and then another and ruined the entire movies.

Leave it as it is.

2014631
offline
2014631
1,855 posts
Nomad

They don't have to be in chronolical order, but they have so far. Also, playing as the terrorists would suck. I would rather do vietnam and U.S. That would be much more fun.

Gametesta
offline
Gametesta
1,705 posts
Nomad

You really should email ConArtists about this instead of making a forum they are probably aren't going to see.

mouseman89
offline
mouseman89
1 posts
Nomad

well i loved both warfare games if they did like 1200 or something they only ranged could be archers and crossbowmen(possibly catapults) rest would be like knights spearmen horsemen etc.

Showing 1-8 of 8