ForumsGamesCall Of Duty World At War Review

13 2160
Holden012
offline
Holden012
1,989 posts
Nomad

Okay WaW, I would say the graphics are great! Greatest detailed CoD Game ever. It's the greatest WWII Game I Have played!

Campaign
Best campaign ever , Action packed stuff.

Nazi Zombies Mode
Nazi Zombies is awesome. I love the mystery box.

Multiplayer
The multiplayer mode is great. A bit better than MW2 online.

I gave WaW a 9.5/10 . Most detailed CoD game ever.

  • 13 Replies
AboutAPlaneCrash
offline
AboutAPlaneCrash
268 posts
Nomad

Eh, I don't really see this as a "Review" I see it as you rating each of the game types, e.g. Campaign, Zombies, Multiplayer.
In my opinion WaW sucked, it wasn't made my IW and it worse then any CoD game.

supersmiley
offline
supersmiley
842 posts
Nomad

I personally like it, it's not as great as MW2 because in WaW you can't customize and it is much easier to see enemies. What I do like about WaW is that the rifle grenade is the last onlock on the rifle and not the first. Also, there aren't any insane kill streak combos like Pave low, Chopper gunner, and AC130s. I would give it a 8/10

Holden012
offline
Holden012
1,989 posts
Nomad

Yeah but it's quite detailed with the gore. Got to give them credit for that!

AlphaPhatMike
offline
AlphaPhatMike
12 posts
Nomad

Sorry bro, but that review was not very good. First things first, a review always has to include things that are wrong with the game. You did not do so. Call Of Duty: World At War is a good game, but I would not go as far as saying it's better than Modern Warfare 2. Here, I'll show you how I would do it.

[/b]Campaign: The campaign is good, but it's definitely not better than Modern Warfare 2. I don't think anything can beat Modern Warfare 2. World At War's campaign is fun, but very frustrating if you are playing on Veteran. Sometimes you'll randomly die while walking on that shit. But on Hardened, the game is actually pretty fun. As far as the story goes, it follows the story of World War II pretty good. And that's definitely a good thing.

[b]Multiplayer
: The Multiplayer is fun for a good three months(Especially with friends). It's just like Modern Warfare 1, only it takes place in the 40's. There are plenty of levels, and most of them are good. The weapons are also really good too. The Multiplayer is probably the gold in this game(along with Nazi Zombies).

[/b]Graphics: The graphics, I think are decent. They look like something from a Playstation 2 game. They are definitely not as good as you described them. In some places they are okay. But in most cases, it's nothing to fuss over.

Nazi Zombies: One of the funnest things I have ever played. If you are looking to play with friends, this is it. This is the only reason I kept the game after beating it. Nazi Zombies is AMAZING. I'm going to rent the game soon, just because I want to play it. After playing it, it's like an addiction. You can't go too long without playing it.

So Call Of Duty: World At War is pretty good game. It definitely doesn't go farther than Modern Warfare 2 though. When, or if you buy this game, do not expect the campaign to be awesome. It won't be. The best thing about this game is both the Multiplayer and the Campaign. Overall the game is about a
8.5 out of 10[b].

AlphaPhatMike
offline
AlphaPhatMike
12 posts
Nomad

Sorry about the bold mess up. Look past it.

Holden012
offline
Holden012
1,989 posts
Nomad

Yeah well thanks for the help , I'll keep that in mind next time I do a review.

AlphaPhatMike
offline
AlphaPhatMike
12 posts
Nomad

I also fucked up on the last part, I meant to put Multiplayer and Nazi Zombies.

Elitemagical
offline
Elitemagical
1,207 posts
Nomad

Didn't like your review that much either, Alpha Phat - you went in to too many little details, say why multiplayer or single player is fun, elaborate on them thoughts with why you think that but specifying how frustrating it is on Veteran, giving approximate figures like 3 months etc. all makes the review sound "in my experience" and try to avoid that at all times when writing a review.

Holden your review wasn't detailed enough, but I generally agree with the points in both your reviews.

nonconformist
offline
nonconformist
1,101 posts
Nomad

Haha id defs say its better than MW2, as MW2s online was horribly made. I already said my bit on that. so look under the MW2 thread for my arguement as why it was an epic failure. Anyways this games Nazi zombies was amazing. Number 1 reason why this game was popular, and why it destroyed MW2 spec ops. The only thing MW2 barely beats WAW by is the campaign, just because theres no infinite respawning enemies. Other than that, MW2s storyline has too many holes, but was perty interesting at the same time. So overall COD waw would win in the fight for me, but thats just me.

Holden012
offline
Holden012
1,989 posts
Nomad

Yeah , I did'nt do much of a detailed review for WaW but for MW2 I had a bigger review.

pauler94
offline
pauler94
2,513 posts
Nomad

It's my favorite of the Call of Duty Series. I'd give it a 10/10 for its fun-ness, and then a 9.9 overall. .05 of a point gets taken off because of the MP40, and .05 off because there's a rifle grenade. I had the most fun playing this game out of any CoD game. I loved the story a lot because Reznov was a BAMF. I also loved playing Nazi Zombies and like how they kept making new Zombies to keep avid CoD players pre-Mw2 satisfied.

halomastr
offline
halomastr
8 posts
Nomad

i luv nazi zombies i play it wit my friends and its so funny

supercoo222
offline
supercoo222
1,270 posts
Nomad

waw multiplayer is not better than mw2. and be prepared to read a good paragraph.

here's why, first of all the balancing isn't all that good, you can clearly say that one gun is better than another. also there is much less customization, martydom was not nerfed as much as i would have liked and the matches were so much laggeier i don't know how many times there was "connection interupted and would rewind the game. besides new nazi zombies maps the map packs su------

Game lobby closed. Host left the game

Showing 1-13 of 13