Well I guess the title says it all, I was just wondering who ya'll thought were the most active 'forumers' in this part of the AG forum. Opinions, that what this Forum is going to be, pure opinions, and yes you can say 'Me'.
oh yes it's thinner it sounded strange. on topic: 1 I tried caviar once... blah. also they kill lake sturgeons to get it, wich are endangered. 2 ambergris? I didn't know it was a food. However they kill whales to get it, wich are even more endangered. I think in some country it's banned.
I have had caviar before and it was disgusting. I remember my dad bringing it home from work before(he's a chef)then he had me try it and I almost puked from how nasty it was. I don't know what ambergris are though.
Actually the proper term would probably be more thin, because thinner is actually a noun, and means, one that thins (like thinning a liquid).
However, plenty of people say thinner in regular, everyday speech as in "a thinner crust" (I even use it that way). So yeah thinner or more thin they both would work just fine.
...but i don't remember if in the US they had it too.
I think most of the really big chains have regular ovens, however Sbarro's has a wood oven and I have seen on television some U.S. places with wood ovens.
Isn't thinner a correct comparative form of the adjective thin? Anyway, both are correct but in my opinion it's better to use the -er ending when possible. E.g. costlier instead of more costly, heavier instead or more heavy. Oh, and homonyms, homographs and the like do tend to annoy at times. Well, that's why we use our heads to figure out the context of the words we're reading right?
Isn't thinner a correct comparative form of the adjective thin?
Good call. I should have searched a little more on the first time. Thinner is also a noun as in "something that thins another liquid" like paint thinner.
Well, that's why we use our heads to figure out the context of the words we're reading right?
Before you say this spam try reading it word by word instead sound by sound.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
I'm too lazy to find a proper explanation right now but you're right.
That's the thing, laziness. We can understand those jumbled pile of letters because as that said, we only read the first and last letters because we're lazy.
It's because were fat isnt it. America is getting fatter while I get skinnier. Fattness equals laziness. And if anyone want to know I can eat like 10 pounds and not gain any weight at all. I'm god(inside joke)
I know quite a few "fat" people *coughmecough* and they aren't that inactive. Although I am lazy when it comes to chores and homework. But isn't everyone when it comes to those two things?
I know quite a few "fat" people *coughmecough* and they aren't that inactive
Offensive and Defensive linemen in football are fat and they aren't inactive, they actually have to be really fast and agile and strong in order to be successful.
And if anyone want to know I can eat like 10 pounds and not gain any weight at all
That's called having a high metabolism. Unfortunately I don't have that...
