ForumsThe TavernSpeed of Light

14 2945
jaza_m
offline
jaza_m
1,356 posts
Nomad

I was Having a conversation with my mate the other week, and he came up with the conclusion that if you travel faster then the speed of light, you gain weight, and don't go any faster.

Heres what he said in the convo ( I hope its not to hard to read, I cbb fixen it ;D)

nothing can travel faster than the speed of light right
but
if you have two particles
travelling in opposite directions
it is seen that one particle has no velocity
and the other obtains all the velocity
so if youve got two particles travelling in opposite directions at the speed of light
one obtains double the spped of light
speed*
BUT!
nothing can contain double the speed of light
so
the equation
Momentum = 0.5*mass x Velocity^2
has to account for the gained energy
Ke = 1/2mv^2
the same equation
if momentum is increased exponentially
but!
velocity cant
then energy is increasing
but velocity cant
SO
the mass of something has too
so!
as something goes faster than the speed of light
it stays the same speed
but its mass increase
increases*
so technically
if you travel fast enough
you gain weight



So I wanted to know if there were any faults in this?

  • 14 Replies
Healmeal
offline
Healmeal
1,941 posts
Nomad

Yeah, or there is a loss of energy through heat?

Nater
offline
Nater
1,296 posts
Nomad

That's saying we would have to go the speed of light to gain weight double us?

MRWalker82
offline
MRWalker82
4,005 posts
Shepherd

if you have two particles
travelling in opposite directions
it is seen that one particle has no velocity
and the other obtains all the velocity


This is sheer perception and has no bearing on the true velocity of either particle.

velocity cant
then energy is increasing
but velocity cant


How is the energy increasing? This makes no sense at all.

so technically
if you travel fast enough
you gain weight


Weight is a measurement based on the gravitational effect of one body upon another. Velocity has nothing to do with it. It's simply mass and gravity.
MRWalker82
offline
MRWalker82
4,005 posts
Shepherd

So I wanted to know if there were any faults in this?


Other than your mathematical equations everything is faulty.
Graham
offline
Graham
8,052 posts
Nomad

Weight is a measurement based on the gravitational effect of one body upon another. Velocity has nothing to do with it. It's simply mass and gravity.


Arrrgggh was going to post the same but then I read all the posts before me.

If you're going the speed of light I don't think you'd want to stay on earth.
ryguy997
offline
ryguy997
179 posts
Nomad

so many flaws i laughed.

nevetsthereaper
offline
nevetsthereaper
641 posts
Nomad

nice, sounded smart though, till i got to the first "but".

flygon12345
offline
flygon12345
62 posts
Nomad

Smart

IcyFeather7
offline
IcyFeather7
30 posts
Blacksmith

the only way to move at the speed of light would be to find a propellent that moves at the speed of light itself. since the only thing you can propel matter with is other matter, and since matter cant move at the speed of light, it would be very difficult. also, if you do manage to go the speed of light there would be the problem of time warps. since time is relative to your position in space, gravitational force exerted and the velocity at which your moving, you could travel at the speed of light for ten years from your perspective then slow down and find you've been away for ten thousand. this would cause more problems then it's worth unless the purpose of the journey was to go to the future. in my opinion the only practical ways to move great distances would be; worm holes, subspace, or hyperspace. each of which would have it's own advantages and problems.

th100
offline
th100
452 posts
Nomad

All I know is that the astronauts that once orbited the Earth actually got an extra hundredth of a millisecond of life after travelling so fast around the planet; the International Space Station could make one orbit of the planet within approximately 90 minutes!

WexMajor82
offline
WexMajor82
1,026 posts
Nomad

We have 2 trains traveling one toward another (cope with me) at the speed of light. When they hit each other, the energy into the crash would be those of 2 times the speed of light?
Why?

greg_greg
offline
greg_greg
440 posts
Peasant

stephen hawking proved its impossible to travel the speed of light.

IcyGryphon
offline
IcyGryphon
160 posts
Nomad

I heard about that, th100, they were orbiting around the earth going the opposite way of the spin of the Earth and gained a ration of a second of life.

greg_greg
offline
greg_greg
440 posts
Peasant

this is the speed of light, not second life!!! lol

Showing 1-14 of 14