Intervention -Same power as Barret -More accurate -Slower fire rate Barret 50. Cal -Same power as intervention -Much faster fire rate -Easier to use for beginner snipers I prefer the Barret 50. Cal
Intervention: - More Accurate - More Damage (proven, actually) - Bolt-Action
Barrett: - Less Power - More Recoil - Quicker Fire Rate - Semi-Automatic
Intervention is better for the simple reason it is bolt-action. Why get another chance if you miss the first shot? You don't get skill that way, you need to be as accurate as possible at first instead of cowering in a corner spraying like a teenage gang.
Oh. I didn't know that. Okay, I'll stop spraying like a teenage gang :P
Hehe. Mind you this isn't completely true as it will only be slightly effective with noscoping. As the recoil of aiming in and shooting crazily isn't exactly going to get u anywhere.
How come we're not talking about the WA2000 either, I mean I realize it is kinda a spray sniper rifle, but you can still get plenty of one shot kills with it.
i know it is good but the other snipes are better at hardcore and are not the same really and most people don't uses them as much
Did you really just say that the Intervention and Barret are better at hardcore games. The best ones for those are the WA2000 and M21 EBR, not the most powerful guns in the game.
Ugghh Can you please get a life and learn to play halo instead of bagging on halo. Geez i'm gonna lay this out straight... MW2 sucks A$$ but here's the truth:
Barret:High rate of fire but low/normal damage. Int.:Low rate of fire but high/1hitKO damage.
Now that you have your stupid answer, You can try playing halo for once...
Ugghh Can you please get a life and learn to play halo instead of bagging on halo. Contradiction? I don't know why I stick up for either side, both have @$$hats and both aren't the best games...
Barret:High rate of fire but low/normal damage. Int.:Low rate of fire but high/1hitKO damage.
