I would say no. First, there are way too many people on Earth to be ruled by one person. Secondly, there are so many different cultures, views, religions, etc. that one leader would not be able to please them all.
Carlie's right, unless you can eliminate every culture and different views, it would be impossible for the worl to just submit to one person, no matter what they stand for
actually there will be. After the rapture there will be what is called the anti-christ he can be found in Rev 13. Most of the people on earth will worship him until Christ destroys the old earth
huh? even then with the whole anti-christ, you said MOST people would worship and from the sounds of 'anti''christ',he sounds more like a dictator than a leader but if I'm wrong srry
Perhaps a one world leader system might exist if the world were to become homogenized to such a point, but I doubt anything like that would happen in our lifetimes, or even within any sort of foreseeable future. The world at this point in time is much too unstable and diverse to handle one person being in charge of everything.
As an example, would you agree with being ruled by, say, a French leader while we are in America? Or even someone from Sierra Leone? I don't think we would since they wouldn't understand what it would mean to be American, would they? Can we say we would do any better? We don't understand other cultures as well as we should, thus making it unfeasible at this time to have one world leader.
